Skip to main content

Questions tagged [undecidability]

Questions about problems which cannot be solved by any Turing machine.

1 vote
1 answer
61 views

If Halting is not recursive, then why is it that not every set of the form $\{M: \text{M is a Turing machine that does XXX}\}$ is not recursive?

Suppose I wish to find out whether $\{M: \text{M is a Turing machine that does XXX}\}$ is recursive, where $XXX$ can be anything about the Turing machine. I have a bad proof that proves that all such ...
Kindness's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
40 views

What is the difference between $ L_e$ and $E_{TM} $?

What is the difference between $L_e = \{ \langle M \rangle | L(M) = \emptyset \}$ and $E_{TM} = \{ \langle M \rangle | \text{M is a turing machine and L(M)} = \emptyset \}$? $L_e$ is not RE and $E_{...
Cesare's user avatar
  • 11
3 votes
4 answers
440 views

Undecidable problems in finite graphs

Are there any natural questions in finite graphs (or digraphs) that are undecidable?
Lisa E.'s user avatar
  • 555
0 votes
1 answer
40 views

Using reducibility to prove a language that accepts $\lambda$ and either loops or accepts other strings is undecidable

I am new to the reduction style of proof so I am hoping to get some help on this problem. Let $L=\{〈M〉:M$ accepts the empty string and does not reject any string$\}$. Prove $L$ is undecidable. My ...
hitchens's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
66 views

Gödel's theorem and machines' power

I was studying AI and when a question came to my mind. I know that one of the objections to the possibility of a thinking machine examined by Turing is the so called mathematical objection, ...
Amanda Wealth's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
21 views

Issues in the proof of $A_{TM}$ reducidability to $𝐸_{𝑇𝑀}$

I'm studying reducidability in Sipser Book and watching his videos, but I couldn't fully understand his proof of $A_{TM}$ reducidability to $𝐸_{𝑇𝑀}$ (p. 218, 3rd ed). Consider this extract: M1 = “...
user169972's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
20 views

PCP is undecidable, but seems also NP [duplicate]

I've seen the proof that the Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable -- let's call this the problem of taking a finite collection of tiles with top and bottom labeled by any two strings, and ...
Addem's user avatar
  • 367
1 vote
2 answers
43 views

Reduce the problem of CFGs with equal languages to the problem of CFGs generating a palindrome

Consider the problem of, given two CFGs $G_1$ and $G_2$, deciding whether they accept the same language, $L(G_1)=L(G_2)$. Call this problem $EQ_{CFG}$. Also consider the problem of deciding whether a ...
Addem's user avatar
  • 367
0 votes
1 answer
43 views

Decide if some DFA is accepted

Given Some(DFA) = {|A is a DFA and L(A) is not empty and L(A) is not equal to Σ^(*)} Show Some(DFA) is decidable. I produced the following answer and wanted to check if I am correct T="On input ...
keth's user avatar
  • 1
2 votes
1 answer
33 views

Decidability of whether for a given $G$, $L(G)=\Sigma^+$? (or $L(G)=L$ where $L$ is fixed beforehand

If $G$ is a CFG, is it decidable whether $L(G)=\Sigma^+=\Sigma^*\setminus\{\epsilon\}$? I have no idea which in direction to go. I feel like it is undecidable, but can't seem to find any proof. I ...
PranksterSabeleye's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
124 views

Is it decidable if $\text{MIN}(L(G))$ and $\text{MAX}(L(G))$ is context-free for a context-free grammar $G$?

Let $L$ be a language over an alphabet $\Sigma$ and let $$ \text{MIN}(L) = \{ w \in L \mid \forall x,y \in \Sigma^* : (w = xy \land x \in L) \implies y = \varepsilon \} $$ $$ \text{MAX}(L) = \{ w \in ...
JimmyB's user avatar
  • 213
0 votes
1 answer
33 views

A decision procedure for PCP

I have read that the Post Correspondence Problem is undecidable. Let's say this is the problem of having a finite set of "dominoes" with a string in the top and another string on the bottom....
Addem's user avatar
  • 367
0 votes
1 answer
60 views

If a language L over a finite alphabet A has both a subset and superset that are Turing-recognizable, does this make L Turing-Recognizable too?

"Let A be a finite alphabet, and let L1 and L2 be two Turing-recognisable languages over A such that L1 is a proper subset of L2, i.e. L1 ⊂ L2 but L1 ≠ L2. Let a language L over the alphabet A ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 1
2 votes
1 answer
114 views

Is matching pairs sufficient?

Book PDF: https://vishub.org/officedocs/13770.pdf Pg 253 of book This is a snapshot from Dexter C. Kozen - Automata and Computability, Lecture-35, Undecidable problems about CFLs. My question here is ...
PranksterSabeleye's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
329 views

Is every non-recursively-enumerable language RE-hard?

Is every language $L \notin RE$ is $RE$-hard? Similarly, is every language $L \notin RE \cup coRE$ is $RE$-hard and $coRE$-hard? It seems like a simple question but I can't find an answer. I tried to ...
Amit Keinan's user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
60