Skip to main content
Seasoned Advice

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • Only thing I can imagine is if there’s set % values they can/do round to. 33% less than 9% is 6%. I know some nutrition fact stuff gets real weird with what counts as “0” and how you get percentages. Have seen 0g added sugar labeled as “1% DV” before … and 1g carbohydrate as “0% DV” for the same item
    – fyrepenguin
    Commented Jun 28 at 3:51
  • 1
    Marketing department is not made of Mathematicians, thinks "math is hard" and also thinks they don't need no mathematicians to keep them honest (well, it's the marketing department, so "honest" is not exactly likely, is it?)
    – Ecnerwal
    Commented Jun 28 at 17:05
  • 1
    I was pondering whether there may be any other fat that is not milk fat in either of these products but all three references clearly state milk fat.
    – quarague
    Commented Jul 1 at 7:42
  • 1
    can you compare the serving sizes? they may consider a serving of the 5% milk fat to be larger than a serving of the 10%?
    – LightBender
    Commented Jul 5 at 20:50