4
$\begingroup$

Why is the density of cyclic hydrocarbons more than that of their acyclic counterparts?

For ex:

Cyclopentane: 751 kg/m³
Pentane: 626 kg/m³

Cyclohexane:779 kg/m³
Hexane:655 kg/m³

In fact, as you can see above, cyclopentane is even denser than hexane.

My reasoning so far is:

Attractions in hydrocarbons depend only on London forces, which increases with surface area. An alkane will have more surface area for bonding as compared to a cycloalkane (The inside of the ring cant be used), so it will have more forces, and hence will be packed closer (be denser).

But this contradicts the facts.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

A simple explanation might be that the ratio of carbon to hydrogen is higher in the cyclic hydrocarbons, and carbon is a heavier element than hydrogen.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.