1
$\begingroup$

In the context of a purification setup I am asking myself the question: Can a UV inactive charged substance made be UV active by a counter ion that absorbs UV light during a column run?

If so, when no other UV active material is present, than would it be a legitimate statement for me to say in a publication, that this UV signal of the counter ion is directly proportional to my product during the elution run and every product fraction would absorb (Or any anion that might present as an impurity?) Because a sole anion could not travel on a normal or hilic phase, right?

For example imagine a mixture of two components impurity $A^-$ and product $B^-$ which are very polar and do not show absorption because the cation $C^+$ (same for both) is inactive. I would assume that you see nothing on the UV/Vis detector. However, I was able to exchange recently the counter ion to one that absorbs at 254 nm: $C^+_{UV}$, resulting in overall stoichiometry of the impurity $AC_{UV}$ and product $BC_{2,UV}$. However, if I would add buffer salts to the mobile phase, the stoichiometry of the different components might change during the run, and product could elute which is not paired with the UV active counter ion? To avoid this, can I run the column completely without any additional buffer salts or is this not advisable?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Clarify your question, please? Normal phase and HILIC are two different worlds. Write the column, mobile phase, UV-Vis absorption properties of A and B. $\endgroup$
    – ACR
    Commented Feb 4 at 16:11
  • $\begingroup$ @Achem: 1) If I pair my UV inactive anion with a UV active cation, can I assume, that all my compound will be visible during a LC run and, not only portion? 2) During a prep run, with a buffered mobile phase, I would assume that the stoichiometry of a binary salt will change due mixing with the mobile phase. Can this be avoided by working with a pure aqueous phase? $\endgroup$
    – raptorlane
    Commented Feb 4 at 16:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You did not answer my question: What is the column (name/chemistry), what is the mobile phase composition and what are the UV-Vis properties of A and B? $\endgroup$
    – ACR
    Commented Feb 4 at 16:31
  • $\begingroup$ I was not yet finished ;). I plan to use conventional normal phase silica in a purification run to remove impurities. I understand that normal phase is not equal hilic, but hilic can be used on normal phase with an increasing water gradient and ACN, methanol or isopropanol as an organic modifier as far as I know. The column I want to use is Biotage Sfär Silica – 60 μm or just bulk material. A and B are completely UV inactive because they do not contain any chromophores. But C contains an aromactic system and absorbs strongly at 254 nm. $\endgroup$
    – raptorlane
    Commented Feb 4 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ In addition, I find the normal phase approach promising, because I still want to keep hard ionic species like salts from previous reaction steps to be completely traped at the top of the column where on special functionalized silica these species may come of with increasing water gradient. $\endgroup$
    – raptorlane
    Commented Feb 4 at 16:46

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You case study is an interesting scenario but in the question there are implicit misconceptions associated with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC). The late inventor of this technique was a good acquaintance and we often discussed HILIC phases in conferences. The punch line is that HILIC mode does not work without buffers. As you have studied about HILIC, the role of buffer is to promote the formation of water layer on the surface of the stationary phase. The "thicker" the water layer, higher is the retention of a polar molecule. He used to emphasize that you must have high concentration of buffer in the mobile phase in order to use the HILIC mode (even on bare silica). The typical concentration should be 25 mM salts; usually ammonium salts adjusted to desired pH. Otherwise, one is basically using mixed-mode retention and ion-exchange properties of the stationary phase/silica surface.

You are right, in the presence of buffers one cannot guarantee that the ion-pair AB or BC are still intact.

Suppose you do not add any buffer to ACN and water, and use bare silica as a stationary phase. Your analytes, A and B are anions, silica at neutral pH has a negative zeta potential due to ionized silanols. Both ions will be repelled, at times, and they may elute even before the dead time and C may show some retention. Note that there are ions from everywhere, including ambient dissolved CO2, so there might not be a very strict charge balance condition for AC and BC to travel together. Ions can also come from glass and metals in the chromatograph. If your molecules are bigger peptides etc., they will show a horrible peak shape on bare silica. In short, salts are needed, with the right pH to ensure a good peak shape of analyte in HILIC mode. I do not recall seeing any HILIC separation without salts. Also, bare silica is not a good HILIC phase for biological compounds.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I was referring to another technique which you may call pure aqueous liquid chromatography (PALC). It was mentioned here: chromatographyonline.com/view/hilic-pros-and-cons In that case In the past I made advantage of IEX properties of silica than. For my scenario, I did not recognize a difference with or without the addition of ammonia as buffer additive for my specific use case, the compounds showed similar retention on TLC and in booth cases very sharp peaks, indeed much sharper than on normal phase TLC. $\endgroup$
    – raptorlane
    Commented Feb 4 at 19:10
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding the contact ion pairs, it would a nice trick if they could stay intact under specific conditions. I would like to believe, that here it could make a difference if you combine a soft anion with a soft cation and have a good match. I would need check the fractions each if there is good overlap or not. Nevertheless when I see, that I need additional buffer components, I would use volatiles whose excess can be fully removed and than as a final step perform an ion exchange to get a defined stoichiometry. My compounds are all small and highly charged, peptides I would purify differently. $\endgroup$
    – raptorlane
    Commented Feb 4 at 19:18

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.