TLDR: Is there an as simple and direct as possible method to measure chloride content by titration?
I want to measure the content (mass fraction) of chloride in $\mathrm{AlCl_3}$ powder by titration. Purpose is to measure the purity of the aluminium chloride. For example assume the measured chloride content is 75 % then that means the $\mathrm{AlCl_3}$ is 94.0 % pure.
When I search for how to determine chloride by titration I get the following three methods, which appear to be more complex than needed: Mohr method, Volhard method, Fajans method. All of which use an indicator and require specific conditions and treatments or reagents. The Volhard method is also a back titration and seems to be the default method for some reason which I could not find.
I found the following procedure, which is basically the Volhard method but with an additional reagents (of which I do not know the purpose) and an additional dilution step.
1.) Prepare an flask with stopper with 50 ml water and chill in the freezer to form ice.
2.) Weigh about 1 g of sample and transfer it in to the flask along with the paper and put the stopper.
3.) Allow it to come to room temperature. Add a few drops of phenolphthalein indicator and titrate with 1N NaOH solution to the end point.
4.) Dilute the solution to 250 mL. Pipette out 20 mL in to another flask.
5.) Add 3-4 mL of conc. nitric acid , 50 mL of 0.1 N silver nitrate solution, 2 mL of nitro benzene and a few drops of ferric ammonium sulfate indicator.
6.) Titrate with 0.1 N ammonium thiocyanate solution to reddish brown end point.
No idea what the nitro benzene is for. And the additional dilution step is certainly unnecessary and lowers precision; could just weight less sample and not dilute. The NaOH step is probably to react HCl (which is formed when $\mathrm{AlCl_3}$ reacts with water and may escape and thus lower the chlorine content) to NaCl; but also not sure about that.
What speaks against just directly titrating the chloride containing sample solution with the 0.1N $\mathrm{AgNO_3}$ solution and detect the end point potentiometric? Am I missing something? Why would people do a back titration with two solutions needed, instead of just a direct titration?