2
$\begingroup$

In this reaction in a Khan academy video, cyclohexanone reacts with Brady's reagent to form hydrazone product.

enter image description here

My question is why doea Brady's reagent + cyclohexanone not also form an enamine product where the central, secondary amine group attacks the carbonyl?

My two guesses would be sterics and/or electron withdrawing effects of the ring, but is there another reason? Would this product exist, but minimally?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Perhaps the nitrogen next to the aromatic ring could attack the carbonyl group. However:

  • The bulky phenyl group is closer to the reaction site, and thus causes more steric interference, than would be the case with the primary nitrogen attack.

  • The nitrogen next to the phenyl ring conjugates its electron pair to the ring just as in a typical aromatic amine, so it is electronically deactivated as a nucleophile. This is especially the case when the ring has strongly electron-withdrawing ligands at other position.

Arylhydrazines are thus much more reactive nucleophiles at the nitrogen that is farther from the aromatic ring.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.