0
$\begingroup$

An atom moving at its root-mean-square speed at $\pu{20 °C}$ has a wavelength of $\pu{3.28E-11 m}$. Identify the atom.

Here's what I did: $$u_\mathrm{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}$$ and $$ \lambda = \frac{h}{mu_\mathrm{rms}} \implies u_\mathrm{rms} = \frac{h}{m\lambda} \implies \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}=\frac{h}{m\lambda}, $$ where $M$ and $m$ are the masses of $1$ mole gas (in $\pu{kg}$) and $1$ atom of gas (in $\pu{kg}$), respectively. Here nothing is written about the gas, so I assume the molecule to be monoatomic only. Let the molar mass of the gas be $M$ (in $\pu{kg mol-1}$). So the mass of $1$ molecule is $M/N_\mathrm{A}$ (in $\pu{kg}$). $$ \begin{align} \sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}} &= \frac{N_\mathrm{A}h}{M\lambda}\\ \implies \sqrt{\frac{3×0.0821×293.15}{M}} &= \frac{6.022×10^{23}×6.63×10^{-34}}{M×3.28×10^{-11}}\\ \implies \sqrt{\frac{72.2}{M}} &= \frac{4×10^{-10}}{M×3.28×10^{-11}}\\ \implies \sqrt{\frac{72.2}{M}} &= \frac{12.17}{M}\\ \implies \frac{72.2}{M} &= \frac{148.17}{M^2}\\ \implies {72.2} &= \frac{148.17}{M}\\ \implies M &= \frac{148.17}{72.2} \approx 2 \end{align} $$

So $M=2$ and the molar mass of the gas is $\pu{2 kg mol-1}$. But there is no gas whose molecular mass is $\pu{2 kg mol-1}$.

So where am I wrong? Any other method is appreciated.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why G? We not to keep M? // You have fast-forwarded to the result too fast. To say what you did wrong, it must be seen what you did. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 3:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I have not obtained 2. Check for numerical errors. $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 3:55
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why not to use $R=\pu{8.314 JK-1mol-1}$? $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ Oh yes, Thanks @Poutnik I messed up with the units $\endgroup$
    – An Alien
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 4:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to the site. Note, chemical information may be advantageously formatted using on ChemSE with mhchem. Take moment to familiarize with this. You are encouraged to use it in the body of questions, answers, and comments. Because it is something special not all web browsers understand well, do not use it in the title of questions or answers. And 2) if you carry units, you may check the results for plausibility by dimensional analysis, too. $\endgroup$
    – Buttonwood
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 12:28

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

The algebra/formulas looks correct, a tip would be to arrange $$\sqrt{\frac{3RT}{M}}=\frac{N_\mathrm{A}h}{M\lambda}$$ to $$M=\frac{N_\mathrm{A}^2h^2}{3RT\lambda^2},$$ then swapping in the numbers, it helps to avoid any errors propagating through if you miss write a number.

If you use the second equation for $M$, with the constants \begin{align} R &= \pu{8.314 J K-1 mol-1}\\ h &= \pu{6.626E-34 J s}\\ N_\mathrm{A} &= \pu{6.02E23 mol-1}\\ T &= \pu{293 K}\\ \lambda &= \pu{3.28E-11 m} \end{align} you get $$M=\pu{2.02E-2 kg mol-1},$$ which is $\pu{20 g mol-1}$ which is the mass of neon.

A side note: if the mass was $\pu{2 g mol-1}$ then the gas could have been hydrogen as you don't need to assume it is monoatomic.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Try $\pu{8.314 JK-1mol-1}$ to get $\pu{8.314 JK-1mol-1}$ // $h=\pu{6.626E-34 Js}$ as $h=\pu{6.626E-34 Js}$ $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 5:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See also upright vs italic $\endgroup$
    – Poutnik
    Commented Oct 19, 2021 at 6:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @nyra note that the problem says "an atom moving... identify the atom", so H2 would not work (though I guess technically deuterium would work). $\endgroup$
    – Tyberius
    Commented Oct 20, 2021 at 0:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.