Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ I find the Remove Doubles method to be highly unpractical. The cylinder case that is in the question is just an example and I originally wanted to use this to reduce the quality of a complicated model by merging the edge loops in it. I mentioned that I don't want to hear Bridge Edge Loops as the solution, but combined with a way to actually merge the original edge loops it's acceptable. I just find many people saying that you should bridge the edge loops and that's it. $\endgroup$
    – Finnboy11
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 9:08
  • $\begingroup$ Your loop cut method is great because it allows you to better define where the resulting loop will be. I actually didn't know that you can just delete edge loops so that the two nearest loops automatically connect. $\endgroup$
    – Finnboy11
    Commented Aug 7, 2014 at 9:13
  • $\begingroup$ > you're looking for a procedure for less than optimzed conditions < Actually this is exactly what I needed. Therefore thank you for the description $\endgroup$
    – avp
    Commented Apr 1, 2015 at 11:13