Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • $\begingroup$ The principles by which orthographic and perspective cameras work are cuboid and frustrum volumes, expressed as transform matrices. For panoramics it would be a cylinder or sphere. It's basic 3D low level programming, pick up The Red Book and it will go over it in detail. To define a camera by a Bezier is to alter the shape of that enclosing view volume, and would allow for things like turning the view more than 180 degrees, which invalidates your proposed approach. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ Panoramic cameras are 360 degrees in any direction. You can deform images rendered with them. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 19:10
  • $\begingroup$ Go ahead - tell me a scenario in which you cannot deform an image mapped onto geometry with nodes :) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ You're assuming that your panoramic camera is of infinite resolution, which it isn't and if it was would still be a massive inefficiency. Please don't make this personal. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ If you are talking about manipulating the volume that is rendered, it still cannot be defined by a curve. The question needs clarification in that case. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2018 at 19:27