Questions tagged [feature-request]
You have an idea for a new feature, or for a change to the existing functionality.
31
questions
22
votes
7
answers
376
views
This site should be renamed
Given that questions about Ripple and other crypto-currencies are considered on-topic: Should this SE also cover questions about Ripple?
I think this site should be renamed to something like "Crypto-...
- 285
9
votes
7
answers
194
views
Do we want Code Syntax Highlighting?
We've had more questions lately in which people asked about specific code from various Bitcoin-related codebases. I've also been approached by a developer who requested that we get Code Syntax ...
MurchMod
- 76.3k
9
votes
2
answers
200
views
Improved site description
I've noticed the site description for Bitcoin SE, shown in the sites overview and in search engines, has not changed since its inception in 2011:
Q&A for Bitcoin crypto-currency enthusiasts
Now, ...
- 8,984
6
votes
2
answers
67
views
Can we have question migration to other stack exchanges?
I would like to be able to vote to close a question to Crypto SE or Money SE.
- 26.6k
6
votes
1
answer
93
views
Why is it bitcoin.SE instead of cryptocurrencies.SE
With all of the altcoin rage and the random loss/gain of trust in bitcoin recently, why is this stackexchange named "bitcoin" instead of "cryptocurrencies"? I mean, it seems like most of the question ...
- 1,130
6
votes
1
answer
92
views
Code Syntax Highlighting - Is Code In-Scope For Bitcoin.SE?
Stéphane Gimenez asked this question earlier today and it would make sense to me if the code syntax highlighting option were enabled for Bitcoin.SE. Granted we're nowhere near SO levels of code-...
- 14.4k
5
votes
5
answers
91
views
Can we remove "based on actual problems that you face. " from the FAQ?
The FAQ contains this sentence:
You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual
problems that you face.
I think a lot if not most of the questions right now don't fit this ...
- 26.6k
5
votes
1
answer
46
views
Add "future market values" to close reason
Currently one of the close reasons reads:
Questions on current market values, energy costs or service provider availability are off-topic as the answers are changing too frequently to be useful to ...
- 3,421
5
votes
2
answers
101
views
How could our "Off-Topic close reasons" be improved? What would be another useful one?
We currently have three Off-Topic Close Reasons:
This question does not appear to be about Bitcoin within the scope defined in the help center. (Default Off-Topic Close Reason)
Questions on current ...
MurchMod
- 76.3k
4
votes
2
answers
234
views
Implementing LaTeX?
Quite often, I find the need to include mathematical expressions, and currently it is very awkward to typeset them. (I typically use fixed-width mode for that since is looks a bit better.) Could we ...
- 1,104
4
votes
1
answer
65
views
Questions that should be directed to customer service of service providers should be off topic
Questions like these:
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/45969/lost-my-blockchain-wallet-id-and-my-email-account-has-been-hacked-i-do-not-have
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/...
- 2,092
4
votes
1
answer
64
views
Option to migrate to Ethereum SE, Monero SE and IOTA SE
Lots of questions belong to these subs. It'd allow these questions to be answered.
- 10.2k
3
votes
1
answer
45
views
How to review questions with votes to close?
Is there a way to see all questions that currently have votes to close by someone? Seems like it would be useful to have community members be able to look through any questions with close votes all at ...
- 5,432
3
votes
2
answers
62
views
How come I can't put math equations in my questions or answers?
Compare the same question on Bitcoin with the one on Cryptography
I think the second one is much clearer. How do various stackexchange sites decide on this and how does it get turned on?
- 7,759
3
votes
1
answer
35
views
Can we create the tag bitcoinjs?
The system refused to let me create it, because bitcoinj already exists. These are two distinct libraries.
- 26.6k