15

This is an entry-level road bike made by "Upland", a Chinese company.

enter image description here

That fork is aluminum. You usually only see steel (and sometimes carbon) forks curved like that.

The only reason you would have a curved fork is so that it can absorb shock from the road... but doesn't aluminum fatigue when flexed like that?

I'm contemplating getting this bike, because it's cheaper than a trek 1.1 (for example), while having better components.

The fork is a concern. I don't mind having a stiff ride (which you generally get from AL forks), but I don't want to take any chance of it snapping due to excessive work-hardening.

Any opinions?

Improve this question
8
  • I think the stiff ride of an Al fork is overstated. If you get a bad aluminum fork setup, it will be uncomfortable. If you get a good one, it will be comfortable. There are uncomfortable adn comfortable steel and carbon forks too -- depends on design and the rest of the bike too.
    – Batman
    Commented Jan 16, 2016 at 17:36
  • 1
    Another thing with this bike is the triple chainring. They have been mostly phased out in favor of doubles on most road bikes. I wouldn't buy a new bike with a triple, buts that's just me.
    – ebrohman
    Commented Jan 16, 2016 at 17:43
  • 2
    For a lot of riders, a compact double provides the gearing they wanted without the need for a triple. But for loads or serious hills, a triple may still be useful. All in all, personal preference.
    – Batman
    Commented Jan 16, 2016 at 18:09
  • 3
    The Viscount Aerospace comes to mind... sheldonbrown.com/lambert.html
    – user_1818839
    Commented Jan 16, 2016 at 21:03
  • @BrianDrummond - Very scary!
    – Batman
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 0:39

5 Answers 5

Reset to default
13

It depends on how the fork is engineered for safety. While its plausible that the curved shape does add to some shock absorption, that is determined by the width and construction of the fork tubing. You could design a fork which was reliable and curved in aluminum or carbon or whatever, but the engineering wouldn't be the same as a steel fork. Whether the fork on that bike has been designed appropriately or not, is a different matter than if its possible.

You usually see it only on steel now, but older aluminum bikes have had that style (even mountain bikes), especially from Cannondale: enter image description here

Jamis's Quest Comp Femme (and other bikes in the Quest line) currently uses that style too, for a carbon composite fork: enter image description here

That being said, poor quality (and dangerous) aluminum forks have been made (the Viscount Aerospace pointed out by Brian Drummond in the comments is one example).

As for whether or not to get the bike, its sounds like you're not all that confident in their engineering, and to me that would be a definite no on buying the bike. I'd rather spend a few more dollars on a bike than on a broken face. If the Trek 1.1 is out of your price range, either find something used and nice or look at other manufacturers you can trust (if you go to brands which are well reputed, but not Trek/Giant/Specialized, you can likely save a decent bit).

Improve this answer
4
  • How do you get to the conclusion "poor quality (and dangerous) aluminum forks have been made"? I don't see an explanation to this in your post.
    – Alexander
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 3:46
  • 2
    @Alexander I don't see how you missed the example of the Viscount bikes - the link is right there. There have been a non-zero number of bad aluminium fork designs in the world.
    – Criggie ♦
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 6:12
  • Basically the forks separated from the steerers in the Viscount example. There are a decent number of bad fork designs regardless of material, so its not too hard to find examples of forks failing in whatever material you choose.
    – Batman
    Commented Jan 17, 2016 at 15:02
  • Good answer, It Depends! there's no way to guess looking at the picture. Still, I doubt the fork is engineered for anything more than low cost, so likely to be heavy and full of material and so could be up to the job. But if I wasn't confident in a bike I wouldn't buy it either, its a false economy and confidence is worth the cost as Batman ably suggests
    – Bent Spoke Cycle Repair
    Commented Feb 16, 2016 at 13:55
1

Curved Al forks are seen on a lot of cyclocross bikes also (such as the German Focus brand). They are safe, if properly designed. The main reason to make a curved fork is probably the fork geometry (increased rake), not flex. Despite all internet talk of "stiff" and "compliant" forks, the tires affect the ride much more than the fork.

Improve this answer
-1

Yes, they are safe. Said better, all else being equal there is nothing about the curve in an aluminum fork that would make it less safe than a straight fork.

Improve this answer
-1

My aluminium framed bike is on its forth warranty replacement - two replacements were due to fatigue fractures where the chainstay or seatstay fractured right through with no warning.

The terminal fractures appear to occur after very roughly 15,000 miles. Until someone can tell me how many miles an alloy fork will last, and the nature in which it will fail, I will not ride an alloy fork. Steel only for me.

Improve this answer
5
  • Welcome to Bicycles @rumbaba. In general we recommend that new members take the tour to make best of the site. I'm guessing the down vote you got is because you only implicitly (not directly) answer the question. See also How to Answer
    – andy256
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 1:55
  • So your answer to the question of "are aluminium forks safe" is a comment about your broken stays ? That doesn't answer the question as asked, so should have been a comment. Or use EDIT to make your answer more relevant to the forks.
    – Criggie ♦
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 4:51
  • This is more of an opinion than an answer, and it doesn't really address the question directly.
    – Will Vousden
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 9:09
  • This doesn't answer the question. Also, I don't think I'd continue to ride a model of bicycle whose frame had fatigue-fractured twice...
    – David Richerby
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 9:12
  • 1
    Criggie - Apologies i didn't appreciate the difference between answers and comments. In my defence my answer is possibly the only empiricle answer you will find on the entire internet regarding how long aluminium bike parts will last. I've asked numerous mike manufacturers how many miles a bike component ( frame or fork ) can be exepected to go before fatigue failure and to date none have given an answer. Considering they all agree fatigue failure will eventually break any metal component, i regard this as pretty poor product testing on their part.
    – Barny
    Commented Aug 15, 2020 at 12:26
-1

The curved forks are more stable than straight one. Curved forks provide a bit of reverse camber, which causes the bike to be more stable in straight-line riding. You may notice that when riding a bike with straight forks that you tend to wobble left and right a bit more than when riding a bike with curved forks. It's a simple engineering principle.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Hi, welcome to bicycles. The question wasn't whether the fork design improved the riding experience, it was if the curve introduced an unnecessary weak spot. Besides, doesn't this curve reduce the trail?
    – DavidW
    Commented Sep 7, 2023 at 5:00

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.