\catchline

Prospects of angular correlation studies of identified hadrons in the LHC Run 3 with the ALICE experiment

Zuzanna Anna Chochulska Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75
Warsaw, 00-662, Poland
zuzanna.chochulska.dokt@pw.edu.pl
Abstract

The study of angular correlations of identified hadrons makes it possible to understand the impact of different processes that contribute to the hadronization mechanism in heavy-ion collisions and small collision systems. Depending on the quark composition and the system properties, the angular correlations exhibit different shapes.
The mechanism of hadron production is non-perturbative, and because of that, only phenomenological models can be used. Those models still fail to fully describe hadron production. In particular, angular correlations for like-sign baryons are not reproduced by the models. The upgraded ALICE detector and the new analysis framework allow for precise measurements of baryon angular correlations which provide stronger constraints on the hadronization mechanisms.

keywords:
CERN; ALICE; O2 software.
\ccode

PACS numbers:

1 Introduction

Hadronization is a process of forming hadrons from quarks and gluons. It is a non-perturbative mechanism that can only be described using phenomenological models. The first models describing these phenomena date back to the 1970s and are still being developed and improved.

A powerful tool used to describe this process are angular correlation functions. The effects that comprise the properties studied include resonance decays, energy and momentum conservation, and Coulomb interactions. The components that constitute the typical angular correlation function are shown in Fig. 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Components of an angular correlation function 1.

The angular correlation function is defined as:

C(Δη,Δφ)=NmixedpairsNsignalpairsS(Δη,Δφ)B(Δη,Δφ),𝐶Δ𝜂Δ𝜑superscript𝑁mixedpairssuperscript𝑁signalpairs��Δ𝜂Δ𝜑𝐵Δ𝜂Δ𝜑C(\Delta\eta,\Delta\varphi)=\frac{N^{\mathrm{mixed\ pairs}}}{N^{\mathrm{signal% \ pairs}}}\frac{S(\Delta\eta,\Delta\varphi)}{B(\Delta\eta,\Delta\varphi)},italic_C ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_φ ) = divide start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_mixed roman_pairs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_N start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_signal roman_pairs end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG divide start_ARG italic_S ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_φ ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_B ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_φ ) end_ARG , (1)

where:

  • S(Δη,Δφ)𝑆Δ𝜂Δ𝜑S(\Delta\eta,\Delta\varphi)italic_S ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_φ ) is the signal distribution,

  • B(Δη,Δφ)𝐵Δ𝜂Δ𝜑B(\Delta\eta,\Delta\varphi)italic_B ( roman_Δ italic_η , roman_Δ italic_φ ) is the background distribution.

To construct the signal and background distributions one needs to correlate particles as a function of their difference in the pseudorapidity ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η and in the azimuthal angle ΔφΔ𝜑\Delta\varphiroman_Δ italic_φ. Pairs coming from the same event make up the signal distribution and pairs coming from different events contribute to the background distribution. Events used for constructing the background distribution are chosen via an event-mixing algorithm. The background distribution enables us to take into account the detector acceptance effects.

The first angular correlation functions were studied in the 1980s, when an anticorrelation in the vicinity of the (0,0) point of the distribution was first reported for the same baryon number pairs. Back then, the possible explanation for this phenomenon was the energy limitation. This was believed to be causing the anticorrelation due to the fact that protons had a considerable mass for the collision energy available, which was just s=29GeV𝑠29GeV\sqrt{s}=29\,\mathrm{GeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 29 roman_GeV. However, this limitation quickly ceased to play a key role.

Measurements of angular correlations for identified hadrons were performed by the ALICE Collaboration in proton–proton collisions at s=7TeV𝑠7TeV\sqrt{s}=7\,\mathrm{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 roman_TeV and the same shape persisted 2.

Figure 2 shows projections of angular correlations of selected baryon pairs on the ΔφΔ𝜑\Delta\varphiroman_Δ italic_φ axis. On the left, one can observe an anticorrelation for the like-sign baryons that cannot be explained by any of the Monte Carlo models used so far, namely PYTHIA6 Perugia-0, PYTHIA6 Perugia-2011, PYTHIA8 Monash, and PHOJET 2. On the other hand, a correlation is observed for the unlike-sign pairs, which can be seen in the right panel of Fig. 2. The models agree with the results of unlike-sign pairs, but the observed peak near the (0, 0) is overestimated.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η integrated projections of correlation functions for combined pairs of (left) pp + p¯p¯¯𝑝¯𝑝\bar{p}\bar{p}over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG, pΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ + p¯Λ¯¯𝑝¯Λ\bar{p}\bar{\Lambda}over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG, and ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛΛΛ\Lambdaroman_Λ + Λ¯¯Λ\bar{\Lambda}over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARGΛ¯¯Λ\bar{\Lambda}over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG and (right) pp¯¯𝑝\bar{p}over¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG, pΛ¯¯Λ\bar{\Lambda}over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG + p¯Λ¯𝑝Λ\bar{p}\Lambdaover¯ start_ARG italic_p end_ARG roman_Λ, and ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛΛ¯¯Λ\bar{\Lambda}over¯ start_ARG roman_Λ end_ARG. Statistical (systematic) uncertainties are represented by bars (boxes). Figure taken from Ref. 2.

The STAR Collaboration performed a similar angular correlation analysis 3 and also obtained an anticorrelation around the (0, 0) point for the like-sign baryons. Since then, many hypotheses of why one can observe anticorrelation have been posed. Does particle mass matter? Does their flavour matter? How does the observed anticorrelation change with the multiplicity of the collision?

These and other questions should find answers with the new data collected by the ALICE detector in Runs 3 and 4. The upgraded ALICE detector with its acquisition rate increased by up to a factor of about 50 in Pb–Pb collisions may allow new analyses to be performed due to the large data samples.

2 ALICE

ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment) 4 is one of the four main experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) 5. After Long Shutdown 2 (2018–2022) the rate of collisions increased and because of that data-taking mode has been switched to continuous, with the unit of data lasting 10 ms being called TimeFrame (TF). Furthermore, several subdetectors have been majorly upgraded. New gas electron multipliers replaced old wire chambers to increase the readout rate in the Time Projection Chamber (TPC), a new Inner Tracking System (ITS) and new Muon Forward Tracker (MFT) have been installed. A completely new Fast Interaction Trigger (FIT) is used to trigger other detectors, and it enables measurements of luminosity and forward multiplicity, and provides fast timing used for Time-of-Flight (TOF).

Apart from significant hardware upgrade, ALICE has also upgraded its software and the data format used. The new data files are constructed from flat Apache Arrow 6 tables, where each row represents a different entity such as a collision or a track. Appache Arrow is a language-agnostic and open-source columnar in-memory data representation format, that is designed for efficient and high-performance analytics.

Furthermore, the new ALICE O2superscript𝑂2O^{2}italic_O start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (Online-Offline) software 7 enables reconstruction, calibration, and simulation of the ALICE data. The O2superscript𝑂2O^{2}italic_O start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT uses declarative programming which differs from the imperative one in the sense that it expresses the logic of computation by describing what the program should achieve and not how it should do it.

2.1 FemtoUniverse

FemtoUniverse is a package in O2superscript𝑂2O^{2}italic_O start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT developed by the Warsaw University of Technology group and is dedicated to femtoscopic analyses and angular correlation analyses of identified hadrons.

What makes this package special is that it can be divided into two phases: generation of the derived data and running the analysis task. The simplified code flow for the typical FemtoUniverse analysis is presented in Fig. 3.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The simplified code flow for most FemtoUniverse analyses.

The first step enables to reduce the data of all unnecessary parts (unwanted variables, rejected collisions, and particles), but also allows to reconstruct quickly decaying particles, which are impossible to register using detectors, such as ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ mesons, V0s and D mesons.

3 Tools

3.1 GRID

To meet the high demand on data storage and data processing the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG8 has been created. It is a distributed network of connected computational sites, which provides means to store, process, and analyze the LHC data. The GRID establishes connections between distributed computing resources, data services, and processor farms over the Internet, providing standard protocols for program execution and output download.

3.2 Hyperloop

Analyzers can use so-called train systems, which allow the use of up to a few hundred TB of data. The Hyperloop train system 9 has been developed to handle the large data samples from Run 3 and 4 using the GRID infrastructure. Hyperloop is presented in the form of a website, which GUI is based on the React.js library. It uses a PostgreSQL database for storage and a Java-based model for bookkeeping of wagons and datasets.

4 Outlook

The FemtoUniverse package, developed by the group from Warsaw, allows analyzers to obtain both angular correlation functions and femtoscopic correlations for identified hadrons. At this point, most of the analyses being conducted are in the initial stages, however, further studies are planned, for which additional development of the O2superscript𝑂2O^{2}italic_O start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT software will be necessary. The new software used in the ALICE experiment presents itself with a full range of capabilities to perform analyses on large data samples using the tools described above. This research will allow the study of angular correlations that will provide a deeper understanding of the hadronization process. In particular, conducting an analysis of angular pϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ correlations will allow us to see if the resulting anticorrelation is affected by the mass of the particle.

5 Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the ALICE Collaboration, for access to the state-of-the-art analysis software and data, as well as for the tremendous support I have received over the years.

This work was supported by the Polish National Science Centre under the agreement no. UMO-2021/43/D/ST2/02214 and The Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under agreements no. 2022/WK/01, 2023/WK/07, and 5236/CERN/2022/0.

References

  • 1 Graczykowski, Ł. K and Janik, M. A., – Unfolding the effects of final-state interactions and quantum statistics in two-particle angular correlations, Phys. Rev. C (2021), 104
  • 2 ALICE Collaboration Adam, J., Adamová, D., Aggarwal, M.M. et al. – Insight into particle production mechanisms via angular correlations of identified particles in pp collisions at s=7𝑠7\sqrt{s}=7square-root start_ARG italic_s end_ARG = 7 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 569 (2017).
  • 3 STAR Collaboration Adam, J. – Beam-energy dependence of identified two-particle angular correlations in sNN=7.7200GeVsubscript𝑠NN7.7200GeV\sqrt{{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=7.7-200\,\mathrm{GeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 7.7 - 200 roman_GeV AuAuAuAu\mathrm{Au}\mathrm{Au}roman_AuAu collisions, Phys. ReV. C 101 (2020) 014916
  • 4 ALICE Collaboration Aamodt, K. et al. – The ALICE experiment at the CERN LHC, JINST, 3:S08002, 2008.
  • 5 L. Evans and P. Bryant. – LHC machine. Journal of Instrumentation, (2008) 3(08):S08001
  • 6 Appache Arrow — A cross-language development platform for in-memory analyticshttps://arrow.apache.org/, accessed: 20.05.2024.
  • 7 P. Buncic, M. Krzewicki and P. Vande Vyvre, – Technical Design Report for the Upgrade of the Online-Offline Computing System, CERN-LHCC-2015-006.
  • 8 Britton, David & Lloyd, S. (2014). How to deal with petabytes of data: The LHC Grid project. Reports on Progress in Physics. 77. 065902. 10.1088/0034-4885/77/6/065902.
  • 9 R. Quishpe, J. F. Grosse-Oetringhaus, R. Cruceru and C. Grigoras, – The ALICE analysis train system for Run 3, PoS LHCP2021 (2021), 250