Controlling quasi-parametric amplifications: From multiple -symmetry phase transitions to non-Hermitian sensing
Abstract
Quasi-parametric amplification (QPA) is a nonlinear interaction in which the idler wave is depleted through some loss mechanism. QPA plays an important role in signal amplification in ultrafast photonics and quantum light generation. The QPA process has a number of features characterized by the non-Hermitian parity-time () symmetry. In this report, we explore new interaction regimes and uncover multiple -symmetry phase transitions in such QPA process where transitions are particularly sensitive to external parameters. In particular, we demonstrate the feasibility of detection of inhomogeneities of the doped absorber, which is order of magnitude more sensitive than similar measurements performed in a linear absorption regime. In doing so, we reveal a family of -symmetry phase transitions appearing in the QPA process and provide a novel nonlinear optical sensing mechanism for precise optical measurements.
I Introduction
In the past decade, non-Hermiticity introduced by the nonreciprocal coupling or exchange with surrounding environment has ignited tremendous research interest, and explorations of non-Hermitian physics using light or waves have attracted flourishing attention where various exotic phenomena and many unique features different from those in conventional Hermitian systems are explored [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. One of the key findings is the exceptional point (EP) surpporting parity-time () symmetry with balanced loss and gain distributions in space, i.e., , where multiple bands coalesce with each other at EP, and afterwards fruitful applications have been proposed including unidirectional invisibility [11, 12, 13, 14] and single-mode lasing [15, 16, 17]. Due to the extreme responsivity of the EP from the surrounding change of environment [18, 19, 20, 21, 22], it has been proposed that one can use EP to perform sensing in photonics [23, 24]. Although there are some debates on the efficiency [18, 25, 4, 26, 27, 28], the idea of using its nonlinear dependence of parameters near EP is fundamentally intriguing.
Most of previous studies on the non-Hermitian EP sensing fall in photonic platforms. Recently it has been noticed that the nonlinear wave-mixing process in the ultrafast science may also support the non-Hermitian engineering, where the property of EP has been discussed [29, 30, 31, 32]. In particular, the connection between non-Hermiticity and the nonlinear wave-mixing processes such as optical parametric amplifications has been unveiled [33, 34, 35, 36, 29, 37, 30], which provides deeper understanding on the nonlinear photon conversion and proposes the quasi-parametric amplification (QPA) with high nonlinear conversion efficiency [38, 33, 34, 35, 39, 36]. Yet, so far, the behaviors of phase transitions and EP in this QPA system still lack further elaborate studies, especially for the dynamical evolution and its potential application with the use of the -symmetry phase transition such as aforementioned sensing. Especially, high-precision sensing has remarkable boost for scientific researches [40, 41], while QPA system may serve a unique candidate to detect the sensing information with very weak fluctuations.
In this report, we investigate a broad class of novel QPA systems including the parametric down-conversion (PDC) process that generates signal photons and linear depletion that absorbs idler photons. This hybrid process can be associated with the non-Hermitian -symmetry system dependent on the signal photon flux density along the propagation distance. Under different parametric conditions, multiple -symmetry phase transitions exist, which results from the competition between the absorption of the idler photon and the signal amplification from PDC. We find that multiple transitions around EPs provides a dramatic variation of signal photons with sharp dips. Such unique feature can be utilized for a sensing detection to measure the homogeneousness of the doped absorber, i.e., very small perturbations can be measured with ultra-sensitivity, which can be verified in our simulations. Thus, our work opens a new perspective on the relationship between the nonlinear wave-mixing process and non-Hermiticity and unpacked an important avenue for the ultra-sensitive sensing at EPs in nonlinear optics.
II Model and theory
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x1.png)
We consider a PDC process where light is injected into a nonlinear optical crystal with the second-order nonlinearity , doped with linear absorbers with . As depicted in Fig. 1, such second-order nonlinear process can support the photon conversion from a pump photon at the frequency to two photons, i.e., the signal photon at and the idler photon at (), and vice versa. The doped absorber is chosen to have the energy transition close to , so it plays the role of loss for photons at . Such linear depletion of idler photons can lead to QPA if one injects strong pump beam together with a weak signal probe, where the nonlinear process can be operated only inside the -broken phase to reach the high-efficient generation of the signal [38, 33, 35, 34, 36, 30]. In this work, different from Ref. [38, 33, 35, 34, 36, 30], we stick ourselves to this system but explore the -symmetry phase transitions based on different combination of inject beams and then point out the potential for sensing in nonlinear optical processes.
For the light propagation along the direction in the nonlinear crystal, the electric field can be described by [35]
(1) |
where is the speed of light in vacuum, describes the refractive index, and is the nonlinear polarization with the second-order nonlinear coefficient and dielectric constant in vacuum . The electric field can be further expanded as where , giving the wave vector at the frequency , is the transverse modal profile, and is the field amplitude for the pump, signal, or idler field respectively [34, 35]. Then, together with the slowly varying envelope approximation and the rotating-wave approximation, Eq. (1) becomes [33, 39, 30]
(2) |
where represents the nonlinear coupling coefficient of the PDC process, is the linear absorption coefficient, , and are the corresponding dimensionless field amplitude with being the total photon flux at . Here, the intensity of field at is so the total intensity of the light in the crystal gives and the photon flux is then defined as .
In the following, we take for the simplicity to explore the -symmetry phase transitions under the phase-matching condition. We define and , so Eq. (2) gets converted to
(3) |
represents the dynamical Hamiltonian of such nonlinear QPA system with three eigenvalues and , together with corresponding eigenvectors and , respectively. One can find that there exists a pair of EPs at
(4) |
labeled as . The -symmetry phase of this system can be analyzed based on the basis , where the amplitude of (or ) determines the -symmetry phase transitions while the field propagates along , i.e., oscillations at the -symmetry phase and amplifications at the -broken phase [33, 30].
III Analysis and results
III.1 Features of -symmetry phase transitions under different parametric conditions
We now show the appearance of multiple -symmetry phase transitions under different parametric conditions in the QPA system in Fig. 1. We first analyze the density ratio on the basis , and also the imaginary part of the eigenvalue , where gives the dimensionless photon flux density for each field. Here, labels the flux density ratio between the pump density and idler density that represents signatures of -symmetry phase. To plot and Im versus the propagation distance , we numerically solve Eq. (2) with different choices of the absorption coefficient , and the initial combination of densities, i.e., (). Hence Im (dependent on ) and (dependent on and ) can be obtained.
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x2.png)
Figs. 2(a)-(b) plot respectively, the variations of density ratios and imaginary eigenvalues Im on different (from 0 to 1 horizontally) and (from 0 to 1 vertically), where each subfigure shows the result at different under various . One can see that Fig. 2 exhibits different characteristics of -symmetry phase transitions during the light propagation when photon conversion under PDC () and its inverse conversion () occur simultaneously, i.e., oscillates as a function of at a fixed . Most subfigures in Fig. 2(a) show such oscillation features for small . For example, subfigures in the second row at exhibit the features that photon conversions continuously happen as the absorption on photons at is small. Subfigures in Fig. 2(b) also reflect such feature. The aforementioned regions in which oscillates in Fig. 2(a) corresponds to the white regions in Fig. 2(b) where Im, meaning the system is under the -symmetry phase and supports two different Re resulting in oscillating dynamics. As the obvious distinction, one notes that for the choice of larger , saturates towards unity in Fig. 2(a), indicating . This result corresponds to regions where Im but Re in Fig. 2(b) as the system goes into the -broken phase, where the population of all three types of photons becomes stable. The critical point of where the phase transition occurs at large distance gradually shifts to smaller value with increasing. For example, for the case of , the increase of leads to a larger portion of the input idler photons at that promotes the photon inversion, which results in the fast inverse conversion to pump photons at under the absorption of idler photons. Hence pump photons become dominant and the region of occupies larger region in the plots in Fig. 2(a), which corresponds to the larger region of non-zero Im in Fig. 2(b).
As the most striking feature, for cases at with either , or , (zoomed-in in Figs. 2(a)-(b), respectively), there are multiple -symmetry phase transitions in the small regime originated from the competition between PDC and its inverse conversion. As the immediate consequence at large , with the continual absorption and the inverse conversion, this competition makes signal photons decrease and so Figs. 2(b1)-(b2) depict sharp peaks, which is also reflected as multiple staggered stripes in Figs. 2(a1)-(a2). Other details can be seen in Supplementary Material.
III.2 Relationships between -symmetry phase transitions and photon flux densities
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x3.png)
To investigate the relationship between -symmetry phase transitions and photon flux densities, we consider in detail the case of and plot the imaginary eigenvalues Im in Fig. 3(a). One can see similar multiple phase transitions as those in Figs. 2(b1)-(b2). At the distance , we plot the photon flux density of the signal density in Fig. 3(b). One can see depletion dips of at each value of that the phase transitions occur at =0.235718 and =0.113317 (labeled as the dips I and II) respectively in Fig. 3(a). Such dips are more sharper for larger , i.e., , while for , the photon flux of exhibits oscillation feature. Note that the number of significant digits in may affect the precision in the non-Hermitian sensing proposed in the next section, so we leave the number of the significant digits in upto six here to see its sensing capability in the theoretical limit. Decreasing the number of the significant digits in will not affect the sensing mechanism with EPs but might decrease the sensing precision.
Other than the imaginary eigenvalue plotted in Fig. 2(b), we also calculate the phase rigidity [42, 27, 43] and include the real eigenvalue Re, both of which are plotted in Figs. 3(c1)-(c2) and (d1)-(d2) with the zoom-in in the vicinities of two phase transition dips (I & II). We can see the phase rigidity vanishes at the EPs, which can also been seen in the coalescence of the real eigenvalues in Figs. 3(c2)-(d2). It is worthy to note that the difference between two transition points in Figs. 3(c1)-(d2) is not equivalent to the full width at half maximum of dips of in Fig. 3(b) owing to non-immediate reaction to convert the signal density in such small scopes of -broken phase. Nevertheless, the sharp dip of between phase transitions holds the potential capability for the sensing under the small variation of surrounding conditions. In other words, such multiple phase transitions can provide a new perspective to explore non-Hermitian sensing in a nonlinear system.
III.3 Feasibility of non-Hermitian sensing from multiple phase transitions
As an example, we consider the problem of sensing the nearly homogeneousness of the doped absorber along direction in the nonlinear system. Small spatial perturbation on may be not easy to be captured from a simple absorption measurement. In this case, the sharp dips in the photon flux density provide a key candidate for sensing quantitatively. The idea is to tune the system operated at the regime between phase transitions (i.e., the dip I or II in Fig. 3(a)) and then measure . For an absolute homogeneous distribution of in the direction, one expects a measurement of the variation of to be zero. Nevertheless, due to the extreme sensitivity from -symmetry phase transitions, small perturbation in can result in different measurements of .
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x4.png)
To calibrate the perturbation in , we define the amplitude of perturbation and randomly set continuously in the nonlinear system, where is the value of the homogeneous absorption (see more details in Supplementary Material). Figs. 4(a1)-(a3) and (b1)-(b3) show the statistics of the output for the choice of different with the choice of , i.e., the dips I and II in Fig. 3(b). Three different distances of the nonlinear crystal () are taken corresponding to the same transition regime in Fig. 3(a), where larger distance gives sharper transition on but less sensitivity on Im. For each choice of parameters, we count twenty sets of simulation data with the random set of . In Figs. 4(a1)-(a3), one can see that for small perturbation , three choices of the crystal distance all give a stable measurement of . The threshold for (labeled as ) that the measurement of becomes unstable occurs at different values for three cases. Namely, the threshold for , , , respectively. It is clear to see that, in this choice of , the longer distance the crystal is, the better sensitivity for the spacial perturbations on we obtain. For one can expect to measure the variation of the absorber upto in Fig. 4(a3). One shall note that here we adjust parameters to satisfy the exact phase-matching condition at the center of the dip I and hence for other there are small phase-mismatching on wave vectors under the spacial perturbations. Other choices of parameters for the phase-matching condition at other values of can be found in Supplementary Material. As a comparison, under this phase-matching condition for the dip I, we also study cases with the choice of at the dip II. In Figs. 4(b1)-(b3), the threshold for occurs at larger perturbation for all three crystal distances, meaning the less sensitivity for this case.
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x5.png)
One can also switch the phase-matching condition, i.e., to set it at the center of the dip II, and perform the simulations for different perturbations on . The corresponding results are plotted in Fig. 5. In this case, for the choice of at the dip II, we can see for , respectively, while for the choice at the dip I with the phase-mismatching, is roughly near for all three crystal distances.
Although one can tell the threshold value of when it varies away from its stable value in Figs. 4-5, it is useful to give a quantitative measurement. Thus, we define the contrast ratio , where is the input photon flux density for the pump and give the output signal photon flux density in the case of no perturbation on the absorption coefficient, and also , i.e., the perceived precision, . If the contrast ratio satisfies , the system holds a sharp dip for the relation between and and the sensing is supported to be distinguishable.
![Refer to caption](https://cdn.statically.io/img/arxiv.org/x6.png)
We plot and with the propagation distance in Fig. 6. In Figs. 6(a1)-(b1) for the phase-matching condition at the dip I, one can see that the contrast ratio for the dip I is close to unity from to because of a sharp peak in the -symmetry phase transition. In this regime, the system is suitable for sensing. The corresponding quantity log increases linearly and we can obtain more sensitive precision at a larger distance. In particular, for , we have and , indicating ultra-sensitive measurement for the small perturbation on the absorption coefficient. As the comparison, when we choose near the dip II, drops quickly after , with upto in Fig. 6(b1). Similar results can be found in Figs. 6(a2)-(b2), where we choose the phase-matching at the dip II. In this case, we obtain a larger contrast when is chosen at the dip II, with reaching at . One can see that the sensing can be more sensitive when we tune the phase-matching at the dip I because of the larger transition regime shown in Fig. 3(a). More discussions on sensing results of cases when one sets the phase-mismatching at centers of dips are given in Supplementary Material.
IV Conclusion
In summary, we have shown that the dynamical evolution of the QPA is controlled through absorption parameter of the system and its spatial distribution. The complexity of nonlinear optical interactions and internal competition for photon conversions supports the abundance of -symmetry phase transitions. We reveal that a small variation of surrounding conditions can directly cause evident changes in output photon flux densities at the phase transition around EPs, which enlightens towards sensing for the homogeneousness of the absorber. We showcase the ultra-sensitive measurement of small perturbations on the distribution of absorbers utilizing the EP and transition points. The proposed novel scheme therefore holds important promise for investigating multiple -symmetry phase transitions as well as demonstrating EP sensing in nonlinear optics, and these sensitive dips can be potentially extended to evaluate thermal fluctuation due to rapidly changing light field distributions [44, 45, 46].
V Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12122407 and 12192252) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFA1407200 and No. 2021YFA1400900). V.Y. acknowledges support of the NIH (R21CA269099, R21GM142107, and R01GM127696) and AFOSR (FA9550-20-1-0366). L.Y. thanks the sponsorship from Yangyang Development Fund.
References
- Feng et al. [2017] L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian photonics based on parityβtime symmetry, Nature Photonics 11, 752 (2017).
- Zhao and Feng [2018] H. Zhao and L. Feng, Parityβtime symmetric photonics, National Science Review 5, 183 (2018).
- El-Ganainy et al. [2018] R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics 14, 11 (2018).
- Γzdemir et al. [2019] Ε. K. Γzdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parityβtime symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Materials 18, 783 (2019).
- Assawaworrarit and Fan [2020] S. Assawaworrarit and S. Fan, Robust and efficient wireless power transfer using a switch-mode implementation of a nonlinear parityβtime symmetric circuit, Nature Electronics 3, 273 (2020).
- Parto et al. [2021] M. Parto, Y. G. N. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point, Nanophotonics 10, 403 (2021).
- Ding et al. [2022] K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 745 (2022).
- Yan et al. [2023] Q. Yan, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, R. Ma, Q. Lyu, S. Chu, X. Hu, and Q. Gong, Advances and applications on non-Hermitian topological photonics, Nanophotonics 12, 2247 (2023).
- Cheng et al. [2022] D. Cheng, B. Peng, M. Xiao, X. Chen, L. Yuan, and S. Fan, Truncation-dependent PT phase transition for the edge states of a two-dimensional non-Hermitian system, Physical Review B 105, L201105 (2022).
- Wu et al. [2023] X. Wu, L. Wang, S. Chen, X. Chen, and L. Yuan, Transition characteristics of non-Hermitian skin effects in a Zigzag lattice without chiral symmetry, Advanced Physics Research 2, 2300007 (2023).
- Lin et al. [2011] Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility induced by PT-symmetric periodic structures, Physical Review Letters 106, 213901 (2011).
- Yin and Zhang [2013] X. Yin and X. Zhang, Unidirectional light propagation at exceptional points, Nature Materials 12, 175 (2013).
- Huang et al. [2017] Y. Huang, Y. Shen, C. Min, S. Fan, and G. Veronis, Unidirectional reflectionless light propagation at exceptional points, Nanophotonics 6, 977 (2017).
- Zhou et al. [2023] Z. Zhou, B. Jia, N. Wang, X. Wang, and Y. Li, Observation of perfectly-chiral exceptional point via bound state in the continuum, Physical Review Letters 130, 116101 (2023).
- Zhu et al. [2022] B. Zhu, Q. Wang, D. Leykam, H. Xue, Q. J. Wang, and Y. D. Chong, Anomalous single-mode lasing induced by nonlinearity and the non-Hermitian skin effect, Physical Review Letters 129, 013903 (2022).
- Schumer et al. [2022] A. Schumer, Y. G. N. Liu, J. Leshin, L. Ding, Y. Alahmadi, A. U. Hassan, H. Nasari, S. Rotter, D. N. Christodoulides, P. LiKamWa, and M. Khajavikhan, Topological modes in a laser cavity through exceptional state transfer, Science 375, 884 (2022).
- Li et al. [2023] A. Li, H. Wei, M. Cotrufo, W. Chen, S. Mann, X. Ni, B. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wang, S. Fan, et al., Exceptional points and non-Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale, Nature Nanotechnology 18, 706 (2023).
- Hodaei et al. [2017] H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017).
- Chen et al. [2017] W. Chen, Ε. Kaya Γzdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192 (2017).
- Miri and Alu [2019] M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
- Wiersig [2020] J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Photoics Research 8, 1457 (2020).
- Peters and Rodriguez [2022] K. J. H. Peters and S. R. K. Rodriguez, Exceptional precision of a nonlinear optical sensor at a square-root singularity, Physical Review Letters 129, 013901 (2022).
- Feng and Sun [2022] Z. Feng and X. Sun, Harnessing dynamical encircling of an exceptional point in anti--symmetric integrated photonic systems, Physical Review Letters 129, 273601 (2022).
- Xu et al. [2023] Y. Xu, L. Li, H. Jeong, S. Kim, I. Kim, J. Rho, and Y. Liu, Subwavelength control of light transport at the exceptional point by non-Hermitian metagratings, Science advances 9, eadf3510 (2023).
- Langbein [2018] W. Langbein, No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors, Physical Review A 98, 023805 (2018).
- Chen et al. [2019] C. Chen, L. Jin, and R.-B. Liu, Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system, New Journal of Physics 21, 083002 (2019).
- Bai et al. [2022] K. Bai, L. Fang, T.-R. Liu, J.-Z. Li, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Nonlinearity-enabled higher-order exceptional singularities with ultra-enhanced signal-to-noise ratio, National Science Review , nwac259 (2022).
- Bai et al. [2024] K. Bai, T.-R. Liu, L. Fang, J.-Z. Li, C. Lin, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Observation of nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics, Physical Review Letters 132, 073802 (2024).
- Flemens et al. [2021] N. Flemens, N. Swenson, and J. Moses, Efficient parametric amplification via simultaneous second harmonic generation, Optics Express 29, 30590 (2021).
- Flemens and Moses [2022] N. Flemens and J. Moses, Hermitian nonlinear wave mixing controlled by a PT-symmetric phase transition, Physical Review Letters 129, 153901 (2022).
- Chen et al. [2023] Y. Chen, Z. Fu, B. Li, S. Peng, B. Zhu, G. Fan, Y. Liu, C. Ding, C. Jin, and Z. Tao, Phase-matched high-harmonic generation under nonadiabatic conditions: Model and experiment, Ultrafast Science 3, 0045 (2023).
- Ni et al. [2023] F. Ni, H. Liu, Y. Zheng, and X. Chen, Nonlinear harmonic wave manipulation in nonlinear scattering medium via scattering-matrix method, Advanced Photonics 5, 046010 (2023).
- El-Ganainy et al. [2015] R. El-Ganainy, J. I. Dadap, and R. M. Osgood, Optical parametric amplification via non-Hermitian phase matching, Optics letters 40, 5086 (2015).
- Zhong et al. [2016] Q. Zhong, A. Ahmed, J. Dadap, R. Osgood Jr, and R. El-Ganainy, Parametric amplification in quasi-PT symmetric coupled waveguide structures, New Journal of Physics 18, 125006 (2016).
- Miri and AlΓΉ [2016] M.-A. Miri and A. AlΓΉ, Nonlinearity-induced PT-symmetry without material gain, New Journal of Physics 18, 065001 (2016).
- El-Ganainy et al. [2019] R. El-Ganainy, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and S. K. Ozdemir, The dawn of non-Hermitian optics, Communications Physics 2, 37 (2019).
- Chen and Segev [2021] Z. Chen and M. Segev, Highlighting photonics: looking into the next decade, ELight 1, 2 (2021).
- Ma et al. [2015] J. Ma, J. Wang, P. Yuan, G. Xie, K. Xiong, Y. Tu, X. Tu, E. Shi, Y. Zheng, and L. Qian, Quasi-parametric amplification of chirped pulses based on a sm3+-doped yttrium calcium oxyborate crystal, Optica 2, 1006 (2015).
- Ma et al. [2017] J. Ma, J. Wang, B. Zhou, P. Yuan, G. Xie, K. Xiong, Y. Zheng, H. Zhu, and L. Qian, Broadband, efficient, and robust quasi-parametric chirped-pulse amplification, Optics Express 25, 25149 (2017).
- Tam [1986] A. C. Tam, Applications of photoacoustic sensing techniques, Reviews of Modern Physics 58, 381 (1986).
- Degen et al. [2017] C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 035002 (2017).
- Ding et al. [2018] K. Ding, G. Ma, Z. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Experimental demonstration of an anisotropic exceptional point, Physical Review letters 121, 085702 (2018).
- Bai et al. [2023] K. Bai, J.-Z. Li, T.-R. Liu, L. Fang, D. Wan, and M. Xiao, Nonlinear exceptional points with a complete basis in dynamics, Physical Review Letters 130, 266901 (2023).
- Gavartin et al. [2012] E. Gavartin, P. Verlot, and T. J. Kippenberg, A hybrid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensitive force measurements, Nature nanotechnology 7, 509 (2012).
- Monzel and Sengupta [2016] C. Monzel and K. Sengupta, Measuring shape fluctuations in biological membranes, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 49, 243002 (2016).
- Lu et al. [2019] P. Lu, N. Lalam, M. Badar, B. Liu, B. T. Chorpening, M. P. Buric, and P. R. Ohodnicki, Distributed optical fiber sensing: Review and perspective, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 041302 (2019).