thanks: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Observation of Co-propagating Chiral Zero Modes in Magnetic Photonic Crystals

Zhongfu Li New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China    Shaojie Ma Shanghai Engineering Research Centre of Ultra Precision Optical Manufacturing, Department of Optical Science and Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China    Shuwei Li National Engineering Research Center of Electromagnetic Radiation Control Materials, Key Laboratory of Multi-spectral Absorbing Materials and Structures of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.    Oubo You New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China    Yachao Liu College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, 518060 Shenzhen, China    Qingdong Yang New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China    Yuanjiang Xiang School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China    Peiheng Zhou phzhou@uestc.edu.cn National Engineering Research Center of Electromagnetic Radiation Control Materials, Key Laboratory of Multi-spectral Absorbing Materials and Structures of Ministry of Education, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.    Shuang Zhang shuzhang@hku.hk New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
Abstract

Topological singularities, such as Weyl points and Dirac points, can give rise to unidirectional propagation channels known as chiral zero modes (CZMs) when subject to a magnetic field. These CZMs are responsible for intriguing phenomena like the chiral anomaly in quantum systems. The propagation direction of each CZM is determined by both the applied magnetic field and the topological charge of the singularity point. While counter-propagating CZMs have been observed in 2D and 3D systems, the realization of co-propagating CZMs has remained elusive. Here we present the first experimental observation of co-propagating CZMs in magnetic photonic crystals hosting a single pair of ideal Weyl points WPs. By manipulating the crystal’s structural configuration, we spatially alter the locations of the WPs, creating pseudo-magnetic fields in opposite directions between them. This arrangement results in a pair of CZMs that possess the same group velocity and co-propagate. Our work opens up new possibilities for topological manipulation of wave propagation and may lead to advancements in optical waveguides, switches, and various other applications.

preprint: APS/123-QED

The emergence of topological materials or topological insulator [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] offers a new and versatile platform for investigating unidirectional propagation of EM waves. A distinctive feature that emphasizes their uniqueness and counterintuitive nature within topological systems is the presence of topologically protected edge states or surface states[1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. These topological states are immune to backscattering and disorder, making them ideal candidates for various applications in information processing and communications. One well-known example is the unidirectional edge states of quantum Hall systems1[20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25], where the existence of magnetic field breaks time-reversal (𝒯𝒯\mathcal{T}caligraphic_T) symmetry and results in quantized Hall conductance associated with an integer Chern number in Landau bands. Classical wave systems have exhibited similar behavior, supported by theoretical and experimental studies1[23, 26, 27]. In addition to quantum Hall systems, extensive research has been conducted on edge states in quantum Valley Hall, quantum spin Hall systems[6, 12, 28, 29, 30, 31]. These states are generally confined to the interface. Recent advancements have also revealed large-area topological waveguide states and one-way bulk states in heterostructures and two-dimensional photonics[32, 33, 34].

While initial efforts have primarily focused on 2D systems, there has been significant interest in extending topological systems to higher dimensions. This includes exploring three-dimensional (3D) topological insulators as well as topological gapless states such as Weyl, Dirac, and nodal line systems. In particular, Weyl points (WPs) are linear crossing points of band structures in three-dimensional momentum space, acting as sources and sinks of Berry curvature fluxes. Weyl systems host a number of interesting phenomena, such as the presence of Fermi arc states at the interfaces and the formation of unidirectional propagation channels called chiral zero modes (CZMs) when subject to a strong magnetic field. CZMs are unique zeroth Landau levels that exhibit topologically protected bulk states and one-way propagating behavior.

According to the Nielsen–Ninomiya no-go theorem, there exists equal number of Weyl degeneracies of opposite chiralities on a lattice[35]. Hence when a magnetic field is applied to a Weyl system, the CZMs formed by WPs of opposite chiralities would propagate along opposite directions. Recent developments in classical systems have demonstrated the existence of CZMs and Landau levels in Dirac and Weyl systems induced by a pseudo-magnetic field and the corresponding chiral one-way transport[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41]. However, in these systems, the preservation of 𝒯𝒯\mathcal{T}caligraphic_T symmetry ensures that even in the vicinity of a certain k𝑘kitalic_k-point where a unidirectional chiral zero mode exists, there must also exist a corresponding mode propagating in the opposite direction at the -k counterpart, as shown in Fig. 1a. This implies that unidirectional transmission may be disrupted due to scattering between different k𝑘kitalic_k-modes. Hence it is highly desirable to have co-propagating CZMs such that the wave can remain unidirectional propagation in the presence of arbitrary scatterers, as illustrated by Fig. 1b. It has been theoretically proposed that co-propagating CZMs could be formed by applying both torsional deformation and external magnetic field[42]. However, its implementation is very challenging and has not yet been realized experimentally. Here we present experimental demonstration of co-propagating CZMs in judiciously engineered photonic crystals with broken time reversal symmetry. Unidirectional propagation of electromagnetic waves (EM waves) has gained significant attention due to its potential applications in optical isolators, circulators, switches, and radio frequency communications[1, 20, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48]. Our work may unlock novel approaches for achieving unidirectional transmission of bulk waves in topological materials.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Dispersion of conventional and co-propagating CZMs. (a), The WPs under a magnetic field in the same direction generate two CZMs with opposite group velocities. The blue (red) dot indicates the -1 (+1) chirality (q) for WP. (b), The WPs under opposite pseudo-magnetic fields produce two CZMs with the same group velocity.

The magnetic photonic crystal used in our work are composed of stacked copper with a staggered honeycomb hole lattice, where cylindrical yttrium iron garnet (YIG) rods are placed in the center of each honeycomb cell, as illustrated in Fig. 2A (additional details regarding sample fabrication can be found in the Methods section). When there is no bias magnetic field, the photonic crystal exhibits the properties of a 3D trivial insulator with a complete bandgap between 18.8 GHz and 19.3 GHz, as indicated by the blue-shaded region in Fig. 2b (r2=2.6mmsubscript𝑟22.6𝑚𝑚r_{2}=2.6mmitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.6 italic_m italic_m). However, when a non-zero magnetic field is applied along the YIG rods, near the K and K’ points, the magnetic field exerts opposite effects on the bandgap due to the breaking of spatial inversion symmetry. It has been shown previously that only a pair of WPs could exist along the H’-K’-H direction in such a kind of photonic crystals induced by the bias magnetic field[49], as illustrated by the solid red line in Fig. 2b. Here we find that these WPs shift along the kzsubscript𝑘𝑧k_{z}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction when the radius of the holes (r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) is altered while maintaining the bias magnetic field constant. When considering an inhomogeneous photonic crystal with a gradually varying r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the k-space displacement can be regarded as a result of an equivalent vector potential A𝐴\vec{A}over→ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG. The artificial pseudo-magnetic field can be obtained from this vector potential as B=×A𝐵𝐴\vec{B}=\nabla\times\vec{A}over→ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG = ∇ × over→ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG. In this 3D magnetic photonic crystal, the WP with charge +1 (-1) shifts along the +kzsubscript𝑘𝑧+k_{z}+ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(kzsubscript𝑘𝑧-k_{z}- italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) direction and generates an artificial pseudo-magnetic field of +BAsubscript𝐵𝐴+B_{A}+ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (BAsubscript𝐵𝐴-B_{A}- italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) when the radius of the holes (r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) gradually increases from 0.8 mm to 1.9 mm along the +y direction, as depicted in Fig. 2c.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Photonic crystal design for achieving co-propagation CZMs. (a), Schematic of a gyromagnetic photonic crystal unit cell with a bias magnetic field. The crystal has a lattice constant (a) of 10 mm, composed of 1 mm thick (h1) copper with two kinds of holes (radius r1=2.2subscript𝑟12.2r_{1}=2.2italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2.2mm and radius r1=1.4subscript𝑟11.4r_{1}=1.4italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1.4mm) and YIG rods (h2=2subscript22h_{2}=2italic_h start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 2mm and d=2.4𝑑2.4d=2.4italic_d = 2.4mm). (b), Simulated band structures without (dashed blue line) and with (solid red line) bias magnetic field. (c), Diagram illustrating the shifting of WPs with structural variations. The WPs with charge +1 (red dots) /-1 gradually shift along the +kzsubscript𝑘𝑧+k_{z}+ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT/kzsubscript𝑘𝑧-k_{z}- italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction and generate gauge fields (+BAsubscript𝐵𝐴+B_{A}+ italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT/BAsubscript𝐵𝐴-B_{A}- italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). (d), Schematic of the Brillouin zone with one pair of WPs. The red cut plane is the kxkysubscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝑘𝑦k_{x}-k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT plane. (e), Top panel shows a schematic of the supercell along the y𝑦yitalic_y direction with red circles marking the varying holes. The bottom panel shows a photograph of the sample. The sample consists of 27 layers in the z𝑧zitalic_z direction and 22- and 14-unit cells in the x𝑥xitalic_x- and y𝑦yitalic_y directions, respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Simulation result of projection bands. (a), Simulated projection bands of supercell without bias magnetic field, exhibiting a complete band gap highlighted by the green shadow. (b), (c) Simulated projection bands of supercell with bias magnetic field (B = 0.44T) near two WPs (kWP=0.33π/hsubscript𝑘𝑊𝑃0.33𝜋k_{WP}=0.33\pi/hitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 0.33 italic_π / italic_h). The solid red lines highlight the dispersion of CZMs (n=0𝑛0n=0italic_n = 0).

It is expected that the artificial pseudo-magnetic field generated by the shift of WPs would lead to formation of Landau levels. The minimal Hamiltonian of WPs can be expressed as WP=i=x,y,zvikiσisubscript𝑊𝑃subscript𝑖𝑥𝑦𝑧subscript𝑣𝑖subscript𝑘𝑖subscript𝜎𝑖\mathcal{H}_{WP}=\sum_{i=x,y,z}{v_{i}k_{i}\sigma_{i}}caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_W italic_P end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ∑ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i = italic_x , italic_y , italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, where σisubscript𝜎𝑖\sigma_{i}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the Pauli matrices and visubscript𝑣𝑖v_{i}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_i end_POSTSUBSCRIPT represents the Fermi velocities. According to the structure of the supercell shown in Fig. 2e, the gauge field can be written as A=(0,0,BAy^)𝐴00subscript𝐵𝐴^𝑦\vec{A}=\left(0,0,B_{A}\hat{y}\right)over→ start_ARG italic_A end_ARG = ( 0 , 0 , italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG ), with a corresponding artificial pseudo-magnetic field B𝐵\vec{B}over→ start_ARG italic_B end_ARG along the x𝑥xitalic_x direction. Taking into account the coupling between the gauge field and the Hamiltonian of WPs, we arrive at the following equation:

WP,LG=vxkxσx+vy(iy)σy+vz(kzBAy)σz.subscriptWPLGsubscript𝑣𝑥subscript𝑘𝑥subscript𝜎𝑥subscript𝑣𝑦𝑖subscript𝑦subscript𝜎𝑦subscript𝑣𝑧subscript𝑘𝑧subscript𝐵𝐴𝑦subscript𝜎𝑧\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{WP,LG}}=v_{x}k_{x}\sigma_{x}+v_{y}\left(-i\partial_{y}% \right)\sigma_{y}+v_{z}\left(k_{z}-B_{A}y\right)\sigma_{z}.caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_WP , roman_LG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y ) italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (1)

In this equation, we have replaced kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT by iy𝑖subscript𝑦-i\partial_{y}- italic_i ∂ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT since kysubscript𝑘𝑦k_{y}italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is ill-defined due to the y𝑦yitalic_y-dependent gauge field Az=BAy^subscript𝐴𝑧subscript𝐵𝐴^𝑦A_{z}=B_{A}\hat{y}italic_A start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT over^ start_ARG italic_y end_ARG. The dispersion of Landau levels can be obtained by solving a non-relativistic squared Hamiltonian (additional details can be found in the Sec. 1 of Supplementary Material):

WP,LG2=vx2vx2+v2[|BA|(2n+1)BAsgn(vx)qσx]superscriptsubscriptWPLG2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝑥2superscriptsubscript𝑣𝑥2superscriptsubscript𝑣bottom2delimited-[]subscript𝐵𝐴2𝑛1subscript𝐵𝐴sgnsubscript𝑣𝑥𝑞subscript𝜎𝑥\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{WP,LG}}^{2}=v_{x}^{2}v_{x}^{2}+v_{\bot}^{2}\left[\left|B_% {A}\right|\left(2n+1\right)-B_{A}\mathrm{sgn}\left(v_{x}\right)q\sigma_{x}\right]caligraphic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_WP , roman_LG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT [ | italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ( 2 italic_n + 1 ) - italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sgn ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_q italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ] (2)

where we have set v=vy=vzsubscript𝑣bottomsubscript𝑣𝑦subscript𝑣𝑧v_{\bot}=v_{y}=v_{z}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_y end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for convenience and n is a non-negative integer. The last term v2BAsgn(vx)qσxsuperscriptsubscript𝑣bottom2subscript𝐵𝐴sgnsubscript𝑣𝑥𝑞subscript𝜎𝑥v_{\bot}^{2}B_{A}\mathrm{sgn}\left(v_{x}\right)q\sigma_{x}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_sgn ( italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_q italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the Zeeman term induced by the artificial pseudo-magnetic field. Previous works have demonstrated that each WP under the presence of an artificial pseudo-magnetic field exhibits symmetric relativistic high-order Landau levels and a single CZM[36, 50]. The dispersion of Landau levels can be expressed as:

ωCZM={sgn(BAq)|vx|kx,n=0±vx2kx2+v2|BA|(2n±1),n>0\omega_{CZM}=\left\{\begin{matrix}\mathrm{sgn}\left(B_{A}q\right)\left|v_{x}% \right|k_{x},&n=0\\ \pm\sqrt{v_{x}^{2}k_{x}^{2}+v_{\bot}^{2}\left|B_{A}\right|\left(2n\pm 1\right)% },&n>0\\ \end{matrix}\right.italic_ω start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_C italic_Z italic_M end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = { start_ARG start_ROW start_CELL roman_sgn ( italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q ) | italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , end_CELL start_CELL italic_n = 0 end_CELL end_ROW start_ROW start_CELL ± square-root start_ARG italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⊥ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT | italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | ( 2 italic_n ± 1 ) end_ARG , end_CELL start_CELL italic_n > 0 end_CELL end_ROW end_ARG (3)

where q is the topological charge of the WP. The sign of the chiral group velocity of the CZM depends only on the charge of the WP and the direction of the artificial pseudo-magnetic field. The corresponding dispersion of CZMs (red lines) and other Landau levels are shown in Fig. 2c. Interestingly, in our system, the group velocity directions sgn(BAq)subscript𝐵𝐴𝑞\left(B_{A}q\right)( italic_B start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_q ) of the CZMs at two WPs are identical. This intriguing behavior can be attributed to the fact that the directions of the artificial pseudo-magnetic fields generated by WPs with opposite charges are also opposite, as depicted in Fig. 1b. When we apply the pseudo-magnetic field in this inhomogeneous photonic crystal, both WPs with q=+1𝑞1q=+1italic_q = + 1 and q=1𝑞1q=-1italic_q = - 1 can generate CZMs with the same group velocity, i.e., co-propagating CZMs. This property enables our system to support unidirectional transmission of CZM, as depicted in Fig. 2d.

Based on the band dispersion and the theoretical derivation of Landau level, we design an inhomogeneous photonic crystal to investigate the Landau levels and the co-propagating CZMs. The metamaterial consists of 20-unit cells, wherein the radius (r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) exhibits spatial variation along the y𝑦yitalic_y direction, ranging from 0.8 mm to 1.9 mm, marked by red circles in Fig. 2E. To confirm the existence of CZM and unidirectional transmission in our designed photonic crystal, we present simulation results in Fig. 3. First, we show the projection band without a bias magnetic field, in which the photonic crystal exhibits a complete bandgap ranging from 18.5 GHz to 20 GHz (Fig. 3a). When the bias magnetic field (B = 0.44 T) is applied, a CZM (solid red line in Fig. 3b and c) appears for both WPs located around kx=2π/3asubscript𝑘𝑥2𝜋3𝑎k_{x}=-2\pi/3aitalic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = - 2 italic_π / 3 italic_a, while a bandgap still exists along the +kxsubscript𝑘𝑥+k_{x}+ italic_k start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_x end_POSTSUBSCRIPT direction. The simulation results agree with our prediction of the constant direction of the CZM group velocity. These two co-propagating CZMs thus ensure that the topologically protected bulk states in our system only transport along a single direction.

To experimentally demonstrate the existence of co-propagating CZMs and the corresponding unidirectional transmission, we construct the designed sample (Fig. 2e) and employ near-field scanning techniques to probe the CZMs (more details about the setup and measurement of the experiment can be found in Methods). First, we measure the electric field distribution on the x𝑥xitalic_x-z𝑧zitalic_z cut-plane at various frequencies by using a z𝑧zitalic_z-oriented dipole as the source located at the center of sample. The dispersion can be obtained by performing Fourier transformation of these electric field data along the x𝑥xitalic_x direction. When the bias magnetic field equals zero, there is one complete bandgap between 18.5 GHz and 20 GHz (Fig. 4a). This bandgap is manifested in the transmission spectrum as a pronounced dip, depicted by the blue shadow in Fig. 4e. However, when the bias field is set to B = 0.44T, the formation of WPs along with the applied pseudo-magnetic field induces the co-propagating CZMs (Fig. 4b), which aligns well with the simulation. Figure 4d displays another CZM dispersion with the same group velocity for the other WP, confirming the presence of co-propagating CZMs in the system. Figure. 4f illustrates the transmission spectrum in the presence of bias magnetic field, which shows a significant non-reciprocal effect of about 25dB difference between the forward (S12) and backward (S21) transmission from 19.2GHz to 20.5GHz.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Experimental observation of CZMs. (a), Measured dispersion spectra without bias magnetic field. One complete band gap between 18.5 GHz and 20.0 GHz can be observed. (b)-(d), Dispersion spectra of CZM with bias magnetic field B = 0.44T at different kz. The blue and green line represent the bulk modes and CZMs, respectively. (e), (f), Transmission spectra without bias magnetic field and with the bias magnetic field. The blue shadow marks the frequency region of complete bandgap and unidirectional transmission.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Simulated and measured unidirectional transmission excited by a z-oriented source at the xy𝑥𝑦x-yitalic_x - italic_y plane with a height of z=H0/2𝑧subscript𝐻02z=H_{0}/2italic_z = italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / 2. Simulated [(a)-(c)] and measured [(d)-(f)] electric field distribution excited by a z𝑧zitalic_z-oriented source placed at the left edge. The sources are marked by the blue stars. The EM wave propagates in all directions for 23GHz and localized around the source for 17.0GHz, corresponding to bulk states and the lack of eigenstates within the complete gap. However, for 19.6 GHz, corresponding to the CZMs, the EM wave only propagate along the +x𝑥xitalic_x direction. The experimental results match well with the simulation results. Simulated [(g)-(i)] and measured [(j)-(l)] electric field distribution excited by a z𝑧zitalic_z-oriented source placed at the right edge. At 19.6 GHz, the EM wave cannot propagate since there are no backward CZMs.

Figure 5 displays the simulated (a-c and g-i) and measured (d-f and j-l) electric field distribution (Ezsubscript𝐸𝑧E_{z}italic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_z end_POSTSUBSCRIPT) in the xy𝑥𝑦x-yitalic_x - italic_y cut-plane at three different frequencies: 17 GHz (complete bandgap), 19.6 GHz (CZMs) and 23.0 GHz (bulk states), under a bias magnetic field of B = 0.44 T (additional experimental results can be found in Sec. 4 of Supplementary Materials). In the simulation, periodic boundary conditions are applied in the z𝑧zitalic_z direction, as well as scattering boundary conditions in other directions. At the CZM frequency, since both CZMs have a group velocity pointing in the +x𝑥xitalic_x direction, EM waves can only be transmitted along the +x𝑥xitalic_x direction, as shown in the full-wave simulation results (Fig. 5b). In the experiment, similar effect is observed. Specifically, when the dipole source is placed at the left edge of the sample, the EM wave can be transmitted to the right along the +x𝑥xitalic_x direction (Fig. 5e). However, when the dipole source is positioned at the right edge of the sample, the EM wave is primarily confined to the source location, since there exists no mode with a group velocity pointing in the -x𝑥xitalic_x direction (Fig. 5k). At frequency around 17 GHz (complete bandgap) and 23 GHz (bulk states), the EM waves respectively localize around the source (Fig. 5d and j) or transmit in all directions (Fig. 5f and l), regardless of the dipole source position. The above results match well with our theoretical simulation results, confirming the presence of co-propagating CZMs.

In conclusion, we have experimentally observed co-propagating CZMs, and the corresponding unidirectional transmission induced by pseudo-magnetic field in 3D magnetic photonic crystals. This is in sharp contrast to all previous studies that have demonstrated the existence of counter propagating CZMs. The co-propagating CZMs are capable of unidirectional transmission of bulk waves, immune from scattering by arbitrary scatterers and defects. Our work offers a novel approach to achieving unidirectional transmission of bulk waves in topological photonic crystals. In addition, our work fosters the exploration of CZMs in topological systems and paves the way for further development of the electromagnetic waves transportation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the New Cornerstone Science Foundation, the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (STG3/E-704/23-N, AoE/P-502/20 and 17309021). Work at University of Electronic Science and Technology of China was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 52022018 and 52021001).

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • Wang et al. [2008] Z. Wang, Y. D. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Reflection-Free One-Way Edge Modes in a Gyromagnetic Photonic Crystal, Physical Review Letters 100, 013905 (2008).
  • Khanikaev et al. [2013] A. B. Khanikaev, S. Hossein Mousavi, W.-K. Tse, M. Kargarian, A. H. MacDonald, and G. Shvets, Photonic topological insulators, Nature Materials 12, 233 (2013).
  • He et al. [2016] C. He, X.-C. Sun, X.-P. Liu, M.-H. Lu, Y. Chen, L. Feng, and Y.-F. Chen, Photonic topological insulator with broken time-reversal symmetry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 4924 (2016).
  • Ma et al. [2015] T. Ma, A. B. Khanikaev, S. H. Mousavi, and G. Shvets, Guiding Electromagnetic Waves around Sharp Corners: Topologically Protected Photonic Transport in Metawaveguides, Physical Review Letters 114, 127401 (2015).
  • Cheng et al. [2016] X. Cheng, C. Jouvaud, X. Ni, S. H. Mousavi, A. Z. Genack, and A. B. Khanikaev, Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator, Nature Materials 15, 542 (2016).
  • Wu and Hu [2015] L.-H. Wu and X. Hu, Scheme for Achieving a Topological Photonic Crystal by Using Dielectric Material, Physical Review Letters 114, 223901 (2015).
  • Guo et al. [2019] Q. Guo, O. You, B. Yang, J. B. Sellman, E. Blythe, H. Liu, Y. Xiang, J. Li, D. Fan, J. Chen, C. T. Chan, and S. Zhang, Observation of Three-Dimensional Photonic Dirac Points and Spin-Polarized Surface Arcs, Physical Review Letters 122, 203903 (2019).
  • Lu et al. [2016] L. Lu, C. Fang, L. Fu, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Symmetry-protected topological photonic crystal in three dimensions, Nature Physics 12, 337 (2016).
  • Gao et al. [2018] F. Gao, H. Xue, Z. Yang, K. Lai, Y. Yu, X. Lin, Y. Chong, G. Shvets, and B. Zhang, Topologically protected refraction of robust kink states in valley photonic crystals, Nature Physics 14, 140 (2018).
  • Shalaev et al. [2019] M. I. Shalaev, W. Walasik, A. Tsukernik, Y. Xu, and N. M. Litchinitser, Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths, Nature Nanotechnology 14, 31 (2019).
  • Ryu and Hatsugai [2002] S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Topological Origin of Zero-Energy Edge States in Particle-Hole Symmetric Systems, Physical Review Letters 89, 077002 (2002).
  • Li et al. [2020] Z. Li, H.-C. Chan, and Y. Xiang, Fragile topology based helical edge states in two-dimensional moon-shaped photonic crystals, Physical Review B 102, 245149 (2020).
  • Guo et al. [2017] Q. Guo, B. Yang, L. Xia, W. Gao, H. Liu, J. Chen, Y. Xiang, and S. Zhang, Three Dimensional Photonic Dirac Points in Metamaterials, Physical Review Letters 119, 213901 (2017).
  • Yang et al. [2017] B. Yang, Q. Guo, B. Tremain, L. E. Barr, W. Gao, H. Liu, B. Béri, Y. Xiang, D. Fan, A. P. Hibbins, and S. Zhang, Direct observation of topological surface-state arcs in photonic metamaterials, Nature Communications 8, 97 (2017).
  • Yang et al. [2018] B. Yang, Q. Guo, B. Tremain, R. Liu, L. E. Barr, Q. Yan, W. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Xiang, J. Chen, C. Fang, A. Hibbins, L. Lu, and S. Zhang, Ideal Weyl points and helicoid surface states in artificial photonic crystal structures, Science 359, 1013 (2018).
  • Cheng et al. [2020] H. Cheng, W. Gao, Y. Bi, W. Liu, Z. Li, Q. Guo, Y. Yang, O. You, J. Feng, H. Sun, J. Tian, S. Chen, and S. Zhang, Vortical Reflection and Spiraling Fermi Arcs with Weyl Metamaterials, Physical Review Letters 125, 093904 (2020).
  • Ma et al. [2021] S. Ma, Y. Bi, Q. Guo, B. Yang, O. You, J. Feng, H.-B. Sun, and S. Zhang, Linked Weyl surfaces and Weyl arcs in photonic metamaterials, Science 373, 572 (2021).
  • Shaojie Ma et al. [2022] Shaojie Ma, Biao Yang, and Shuang Zhang, Topological photonics in metamaterials, Photonics Insights 1, R02 (2022).
  • Zhou et al. [2020] P. Zhou, G.-G. Liu, Y. Yang, Y.-H. Hu, S. Ma, H. Xue, Q. Wang, L. Deng, and B. Zhang, Observation of Photonic Antichiral Edge States, Physical Review Letters 125, 263603 (2020).
  • Haldane and Raghu [2008] F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Possible Realization of Directional Optical Waveguides in Photonic Crystals with Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry, Physical Review Letters 100, 013904 (2008).
  • v. Klitzing et al. [1980] K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Physical Review Letters 45, 494 (1980).
  • Halperin [1982] B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current-carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Physical Review B 25, 2185 (1982).
  • Wang et al. [2009] Z. Wang, Y. Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states, Nature 461, 772 (2009).
  • Jin et al. [2022] J. Jin, L. He, J. Lu, E. J. Mele, and B. Zhen, Floquet Quadrupole Photonic Crystals Protected by Space-Time Symmetry, Physical Review Letters 129, 063902 (2022).
  • Lu et al. [2021] J. Lu, L. He, Z. Addison, E. J. Mele, and B. Zhen, Floquet Topological Phases in One-Dimensional Nonlinear Photonic Crystals, Physical Review Letters 126, 113901 (2021).
  • Skirlo et al. [2014] S. A. Skirlo, L. Lu, and M. Soljačić, Multimode One-Way Waveguides of Large Chern Numbers, Physical Review Letters 113, 113904 (2014).
  • Skirlo et al. [2015] S. A. Skirlo, L. Lu, Y. Igarashi, Q. Yan, J. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Experimental Observation of Large Chern Numbers in Photonic Crystals, Physical Review Letters 115, 253901 (2015).
  • Ma and Shvets [2016] T. Ma and G. Shvets, All-Si valley-Hall photonic topological insulator, New Journal of Physics 18, 025012 (2016).
  • Dong et al. [2017] J.-W. Dong, X.-D. Chen, H. Zhu, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Valley photonic crystals for control of spin and topology, Nature Materials 16, 298 (2017).
  • Lu et al. [2017] J. Lu, C. Qiu, L. Ye, X. Fan, M. Ke, F. Zhang, and Z. Liu, Observation of topological valley transport of sound in sonic crystals, Nature Physics 13, 369 (2017).
  • Noh et al. [2018] J. Noh, S. Huang, K. P. Chen, and M. C. Rechtsman, Observation of Photonic Topological Valley Hall Edge States, Physical Review Letters 120, 063902 (2018).
  • Wang et al. [2021] M. Wang, R.-Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Wang, Q. Guo, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Topological One-Way Large-Area Waveguide States in Magnetic Photonic Crystals, Physical Review Letters 126, 067401 (2021).
  • Wang et al. [2020] M. Wang, W. Zhou, L. Bi, C. Qiu, M. Ke, and Z. Liu, Valley-locked waveguide transport in acoustic heterostructures, Nature Communications 11, 3000 (2020).
  • Chen and Li [2022] J. Chen and Z.-Y. Li, Prediction and Observation of Robust One-Way Bulk States in a Gyromagnetic Photonic Crystal, Physical Review Letters 128, 257401 (2022).
  • Nielsen and Ninomiya [1981] H. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Absence of neutrinos on a lattice: (I). Proof by homotopy theory, Nuclear Physics B 185, 20 (1981).
  • Ma et al. [2023] S. Ma, H. Jia, Y. Bi, S. Ning, F. Guan, H. Liu, C. Wang, and S. Zhang, Gauge Field Induced Chiral Zero Mode in Five-Dimensional Yang Monopole Metamaterials, Physical Review Letters 130, 243801 (2023).
  • Jia et al. [2019] H. Jia, R. Zhang, W. Gao, Q. Guo, B. Yang, J. Hu, Y. Bi, Y. Xiang, C. Liu, and S. Zhang, Observation of chiral zero mode in inhomogeneous three-dimensional Weyl metamaterials, Science 363, 148 (2019).
  • Wen et al. [2019] X. Wen, C. Qiu, Y. Qi, L. Ye, M. Ke, F. Zhang, and Z. Liu, Acoustic Landau quantization and quantum-Hall-like edge states, Nature Physics 15, 352 (2019).
  • Peri et al. [2019] V. Peri, M. Serra-Garcia, R. Ilan, and S. D. Huber, Axial-field-induced chiral channels in an acoustic Weyl system, Nature Physics 15, 357 (2019).
  • Grushin et al. [2016] A. G. Grushin, J. W. F. Venderbos, A. Vishwanath, and R. Ilan, Inhomogeneous Weyl and Dirac Semimetals: Transport in Axial Magnetic Fields and Fermi Arc Surface States from Pseudo-Landau Levels, Physical Review X 6, 041046 (2016).
  • Jia et al. [2023] H. Jia, M. Wang, S. Ma, R.-Y. Zhang, J. Hu, D. Wang, and C. T. Chan, Experimental realization of chiral Landau levels in two-dimensional Dirac cone systems with inhomogeneous effective mass, Light: Science & Applications 12, 165 (2023).
  • Pikulin et al. [2016] D. I. Pikulin, A. Chen, and M. Franz, Chiral Anomaly from Strain-Induced Gauge Fields in Dirac and Weyl Semimetals, Physical Review X 6, 041021 (2016).
  • Sounas and Alù [2017] D. L. Sounas and A. Alù, Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation, Nature Photonics 11, 774 (2017).
  • Reiskarimian and Krishnaswamy [2016] N. Reiskarimian and H. Krishnaswamy, Magnetic-free non-reciprocity based on staggered commutation, Nature Communications 7, 11217 (2016).
  • Li et al. [2011] X.-F. Li, X. Ni, L. Feng, M.-H. Lu, C. He, and Y.-F. Chen, Tunable Unidirectional Sound Propagation through a Sonic-Crystal-Based Acoustic Diode, Physical Review Letters 106, 084301 (2011).
  • He et al. [2010] C. He, X.-L. Chen, M.-H. Lu, X.-F. Li, W.-W. Wan, X.-S. Qian, R.-C. Yin, and Y.-F. Chen, Tunable one-way cross-waveguide splitter based on gyromagnetic photonic crystal, Applied Physics Letters 96, 111111 (2010).
  • Yu and Fan [2009] Z. Yu and S. Fan, Complete optical isolation created by indirect interband photonic transitions, Nature Photonics 3, 91 (2009).
  • Serebryannikov [2009] A. E. Serebryannikov, One-way diffraction effects in photonic crystal gratings made of isotropic materials, Physical Review B 80, 155117 (2009).
  • Liu et al. [2022] G.-G. Liu, Z. Gao, Q. Wang, X. Xi, Y.-H. Hu, M. Wang, C. Liu, X. Lin, L. Deng, S. A. Yang, P. Zhou, Y. Yang, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological Chern vectors in three-dimensional photonic crystals, Nature 609, 925 (2022).
  • Bellec et al. [2020] M. Bellec, C. Poli, U. Kuhl, F. Mortessagne, and H. Schomerus, Observation of supersymmetric pseudo-Landau levels in strained microwave graphene, Light: Science & Applications 9, 146 (2020).