The Belle II Detector Upgrades Framework Conceptual Design Report

\addbibresource

belle2upgrades.bib

[Uncaptioned image]

BELLE2-REPORT-2024-042

KEK-REPORT-2024-1

4 July 2024

The Belle II Detector Upgrades
Framework Conceptual Design Report

We describe the planned near-term and potential longer-term upgrades of the Belle II detector at the SuperKEKB electron-positron collider operating at the KEK laboratory in Tsukuba, Japan. These upgrades will allow increasingly sensitive searches for possible new physics beyond the Standard Model in flavor, tau, electroweak and dark sector physics that are both complementary to and competitive with the LHC and other experiments.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

KEK Reports are available from:

Some textHigh Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)

Some text1-1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi

Some textIbaraki-ken, 305-0801

Some textJAPAN

Phone: +81-29-864-5137

Fax: +81-29-864-4604

E-mail: irdpub@mail.kek.jp

Internet: https://www.kek.jp/en/

Executive Summary

The SuperKEKB accelerator and the Belle II detector started operation in 2019 with a steady increase in luminosity, reaching a peak instantaneous luminosity of $\mathcal{L}_{\rm peak}$ = $4.65\text{\times}{10}^{34}\text{\,}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ in June 2022 and collecting an integrated luminosity of \qty424 fb ^-1. It has become clear that reaching the target peak luminosity of $6\text{\times}{10}^{35}\text{\,}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ and the integrated luminosity \qty50ab^-1 will require an upgrade of the accelerator complex, including potentially a redesign of the interaction region (IR).

A new IR would require a replacement of the vertex detector, and would imply the need for a long shutdown (named LS2, since LS1 extended from 6/2022 to 12/2023), providing also a window of opportunity for the installation of improvements in many detector subsystems. The timescale for LS2 is placed after 2027–2028 but not well defined yet, as it depends on the precise definition of the accelerator upgrade plans. It should become clearer after the restart of the operation in 2024 and the full evaluation of the LS1 improvements. It should be added that the extrapolation of backgrounds to full luminosity is affected by large uncertainties which may erode the Belle II safety margins and reduce the overall operational efficiency.

The Belle II upgrade program is therefore motivated by the desire to improve the overall physics performance of the experiment by: (i) improving the robustness against backgrounds and the radiation resistance, providing larger safety factors to run at high luminosity; (ii) developing the technology to cope with different future paths, improving the detector performance, and also providing a safety net in case anything goes wrong with the current detector.

This Framework Conceptual Design Report (FCDR) presents a number of possible detector improvements that can be implemented in the short or medium term, along with other ideas for longer term upgrades, that go beyond the currently planned program. The various upgrades are largely independent of each other and can be selected individually on the basis of actual need, physics performance, technical readiness, and funding availability. In this sense they do not form a single coherent picture of the future Belle II, but rather a menu of possibilities. A different kind of opportunity is explored by the beam polarization option, which requires a SuperKEKB upgrade but no detector modification, opening a new and unique program of precision physics. Only a brief summary is presented in this FCDR.

BPAC Review

In December 2023 the FCDR was submitted to the B-Factory Programme Advisory Committee who reviewed it during the February 2024 meeting. In the report [bpac-reports], the committee observes: The BPAC has reviewed the CDR, and recognises the large amount of excellent work that it contains. However, given the structure of the document explained above, it does not represent a coherent proposal for a coordinated upgrade of the experiment and collider on a common timescale, and as such the committee cannot make a recommendation concerning the document as a whole. Instead, comments from the BPAC review are provided here to the individual sections of the CDR, following the order of their presentation in the document.

As a response, the FCDR has been modified to show that the specific comments and recommendations have been received and that the work required to address them is being planned.

The recommendations from BPAC are listed below:

•

The R&D required for defining the machine upgrade should proceed in a timely manner, to avoid any unnecessary delay to the schedule for the upgrade, and the timescale for LS2 should be adapted as required.
•

Studies are well advanced for the new vertex detector system (VTX) that is envisioned to replace the current vertex detector. Work on this detector should advance towards the engineering level studies, including the aspects of system integration and operation. This will enable progress to be made quickly on the final design once the machine upgrade has been defined.
•

Further R&D work should also continue for the other proposed detector upgrades, but the BPAC considers that a new document providing a coherent and integrated description of the accelerator and detector upgrade plan, with a quantitative demonstration of expected physics performance, will be required once the overall scope has been defined, for a decision to be made on the project. Such a document should also demonstrate the tolerance against background rates at a luminosity of $6\text{\times}{10}^{35}\text{\,}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ and radiation damage corresponding to an integrated luminosity of \qty50ab^-1.
•

It is important to make the progression from qualitative to quantitative statements on the expected physics impact of the upgrade (for instance the KLM upgrade) and to demonstrate the overall performance of the upgraded detector for the main physics channels.
•

The committee appreciates that the proposed test of production of polarised elec- trons in the injector and measuring the polarisation decay time in the SuperKEKB ring will provide essential information for making further decisions on the idea to collect data with a longitudinally polarised beam. However, it should be noted that the highest priority of the coming period must remain to achieve stable machine operation with a luminosity above ${10}^{35}\text{\,}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}^{-2}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ for data taking.

The various options are the result of an internal selection process over the course of the past 2-3 years and are clearly at different levels of readiness. This FCDR documents the current state so that R&D and engineering activities can be properly organized. The next step will be the preparation of Technical Design Reports for those options that are worth pursuing, possibly on different timescales, as well as a document providing a coherent and integrated description of the accelerator and detector upgrade plan, as specifically requested by the BPAC.

Executive Summary

BPAC Review

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 2 SuperKEKB

Chapter 3 Machine Detector Interface

Chapter 4 Physics Performance

Chapter 5 Inner Detector

Chapter 6 Outer Detector

Chapter 7 Software, Trigger, DAQ

Chapter 8 Beam Polarization and Chiral Belle

Chapter 9 Longer Term Upgrades