21

Following ArXiv rules I contacted with an well-known expert in thermodynamics (he is author of a known monograph) we discussed my work during several days and finally he endorsed me. When my work was ready to appear a moderator removed it, alluding to technical problems with my submission (a embedded font problem), although more latter moderators asked me personal and even economic questions! I never answer such questions and forgot the whole issue

The paper is accessible in my page at academia.edu

I have participated in an Essay Contest with another work, and it has been selected as one of the finalists. It is cited here together other three finalist essays.

I submitted this new work to ArXiV, it has been removed and I received the next response:

Your submission has been removed upon a notice from our moderators, who determined it to be inappropriate for arXiv. Please find another forum.

For more information on our moderation policies see:

http: //arxiv. org/help/moderation

-- arXiv moderation

ArXiv already archives several essays submitted to the same Essay contest, such as 1209.0023, 1209.1257, 1211.1917, 1210.3575

Therefore it is not a problem with the Contest or with the format. Notice that only one of above four has been selected as finalist.

According to the moderation policy I cannot ask to moderators about the details on their decision. The excuse is that "moderators are not referees", but this looks a bit childish, because it seems that they are accepting that moderators cannot sustain logically the decisions that they take about others' work.

Would I write to the advisory committee chair? Would I take some other action?

EDIT: Finally the first work rejected by Arxiv mods was published in the International Journal of Thermodynamics. I no longer care about ArXiv.

Improve this question
20
  • 5
    What's the relationship between the first and the second paper? At first glance, it seems like two different issues (which would be better in two different questions then).
    – user102
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 18:34
  • 6
    Is this on scope ? this seems to be an arxiv specific issue.
    – Suresh
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 18:37
  • 5
    @Suresh: I think we've had many questions about arXiv here, so I wouldn't classify it as off-topic just because of that.
    – user102
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 18:42
  • 9
    @juanrga: At the link you put, there is: "If you disagree with a moderation decision, you should submit an appeal that explains clearly and succinctly what your arguments are." Have you submitted an appeal yet? I don't see where it's written that the moderators won't answer.
    – user102
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 19:13
  • 7
    When you say personal and economic questions, do you mean asking about potential conflicts of interests?
    – StrongBad
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 21:17

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
22

As said in the comments, the situation seems to be different for each of your papers. The font problem is understandable, but it's hard to see what you mean by "personal and even economic questions". However, if you didn't answer the questions, it's not surprising that your paper was not published in arXiv.

Concerning the essay, I quote from the FAQ, "arXiv accepts only submissions in the form of an article that would be refereeable by a conventional publication venue.", and in particular, " This excludes [...] papers that contain inflammatory or fictitious content, papers that use highly dramatic and mis-representative titles/abstracts/introductions". I'm in no position to scientifically judge the content of your essay, but at first glance, it seems quite provocative (assumptions that are not fundamental).

If you believe that your essay is "refereeable by a conventional publication venue", then the moderation appeal is there for this. Although the moderators do not have to motivate their decision as a reviewer would do, by bringing sufficient support that your paper meets the criteria required by arXiv (in particular by demonstrating that it doesn't fit in any of the categories listed under "inappropriate format", the fact that other essays have been published in the past is not really relevant, you would have to show the quality of your content on its own).

In general, arXiv moderators are human moderators, and it could be the case that the rejection of your paper was a mistake. However, keep in mind that publishing in arXiv is not a granted right, and that "arXiv reserves the right to reject or reclassify any submission".

Improve this answer
4
  • 2
    The theme for this Essay Contest is: Questioning the Foundations: Which of Our Basic Physical assumptions are Wrong? and as said at least 4 essays are archived in ArXiv. Yes you are right that ArXiv reserves the right. I am asking for advice about possible actions to take.
    – juanrga
    Commented Nov 30, 2012 at 0:32
  • 4
    Gather the info, submit an appeal. If this appeal is rejected, only then you can try to contact the advisory committee chair. That's the only action you can take at this step (or just put your paper somewhere else).
    – user102
    Commented Nov 30, 2012 at 8:42
  • 3
    @juanrga Do you have any update on the issue?
    – user13107
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 3:04
  • @user13107 Finally, my work was published in the International Journal of Thermodynamics. I contacted a last time with Arxiv mods commenting them that the paper they rejected without any explanation was published. I no longer am interested in so biased site.
    – juanrga
    Commented Apr 15, 2016 at 19:01
-6

Of course, arXiv.org is the best place to go without peer-review. Many papers that appear in arXiv are of the highest quality. Be polite with moderators, never challenge them as they have the right to reject any paper without any explanation. Try to appeal. If this does not help, address this issue to Chair. If again no result, go to vixra.org and publish your paper over there without headache. Vixra.org is the best solution when you unable to publish it in arxiv.org.

Improve this answer
2
  • 23
    Publishing on Vixra is almost surely a mistake, if one wants to ever be taken seriously by professionals, etc.
    – paul garrett
    Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 23:42
  • viXra is a legitimate reaction to arXiv's tendency in taking itself too seriously. arXiv moderators say that they are not reviewers (since they are not specialists in the field) but still act as reviewers when refusing papers as "not being interesting enough", that's hypocrisy.
    – yannis
    Commented Nov 17, 2020 at 18:47
-9

If arxiv rejects your paper, go to vixra.org. You can also publish it in researchgate.net Don't get upset and try to be fast with your publication. Remember, any submission you've made is a potential leak of your idea!

Improve this answer
8
  • 16
    The idea that someone is going to steal a paper rejected from the arXiv is on the far side of paranoid.
    – Corvus
    Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 20:09
  • @Corvus Why? If it is rejected for font issues then it seems just as likely as any other unpublished paper to be stolen.
    – Simd
    Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 20:13
  • 2
    @dorothy, do you know of a single case where a moderator at the arXiv has stolen a rejected paper?
    – Corvus
    Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 20:23
  • 6
    The chances that an idea is worth stealing in the first place are much smaller than the author may often suspect, especially when worrying about such a thing... especially if the arXiv.org moderators reject the paper entirely. Again, as in a comment of mine to another answer to this question, if you do have hope of being taken seriously by professionals, editing and resubmitting to arXiv, ... not vixra or other similar.
    – paul garrett
    Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 23:44
  • 1
    @user32476 Perelman was quite well known before his paper, or I do not think that a hard to read/follow paper would have been quite that a success in the community. And the "leak" was not that - the story is a bit more intricate in that, as far as I understand, it was claimed that the paper had gaps which had been filled. The discussion is now what is a gap, and what is simply something that the reader has not understood that the author did? So, Perelman does not quite qualify as a counterexample.
    – Captain Emacs
    Commented Apr 16, 2016 at 14:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .