I am currently in the process of addressing the feedback received from a reviewer regarding a manuscript I've submitted. The primary concern raised is that there are "Too many simulation results presented in the manuscript. Almost five full pages of the manuscript are dedicated to sim-results, which is too much."
Have you encountered similar situations or have experience dealing with such feedback? The manuscript in question is a simulation-based work, totaling 17 pages. Given the nature of the research, a significant portion is dedicated to presenting simulation results.
I am unsure about the best approach to respond to the reviewer's comment. Should I consider condensing the results section, or is there a way to better justify the extensive presentation of simulation results in a simulation-focused manuscript?