0

I am an international academic having received my degrees in 4 different countries.

I began my career in a highly prestigious position in industry, but thoroughly enjoyed research so made a move into academia to an Assistant Professor (non tenure track) at 1/3rd my salary. I then held two Associate Professor positions (both tenure track) before being appointed tenured Full Professor.

I then left academia for industry spending about 10 years there.

I applied for an academic position advertised at Professor/Associate Professor rank at a University (a peer institution to my former one) but they tell me that their selection committee shortlisted me for the "Associate Professor" appointment.

I feel very discouraged because I am much more experienced (academic + industry) and considerably older than most Associate Professors in my field. At the salary offered I doubt I will be able to break even on the cost of my education.

Two possibilities here: Either the selection committee had another candidate in mind from the beginning for the Full Professorship or they are deliberately intending to be exploitative (unemployment in my country is around 50%).

I don't know if at this age I still have the stamina and energy to work my way back to Full Professor and can only imagine how tense the office politics could get if I am perceived as a "less than" academic. I have never before seen a peer institution refuse to acknowledge status (since we are all state institutions) in my country before.

Is this an ethical practice?

5
  • 9
    There is a third option - your academic CV was good enough for a position as full prof ten years ago, but it isn't any longer. One of the unfortunate side effects of a highly competitive hiring market is that the barrier of what is needed in terms of concrete achievements for a specific rank rise all the time. So I don't think that foul play on the institution's part is a given (although of course always a possibility).
    – xLeitix
    Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 11:09
  • Are they willing to shorten the time to advancement? Say to 2-3 years?
    – Buffy
    Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 11:29
  • 10
    I’m voting to close this question because it is a complaint, not a question. Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 13:12
  • 7
    "I don't know if at this age I still have the stamina and energy to work my way back" Then why do you think you can be successful as a full professor? Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 13:13
  • 1
    I don't see how this is a demotion, as you are not in a full professor position now. Unless we know how the job was advertised, it is hard to say if the offer is unethical. Commented Apr 6, 2022 at 3:16

1 Answer 1

10

You cannot control what others do, but you can control what you do. In your case, you can just walk away from the application and say that it is below your dignity to consider a position that you believe sells you short. In fact, reading between the lines of your post, you appear quite bitter about the slight, and one can wonder whether you would ever be happy at that institution given how you feel treated.

Of course, the alternative would be to go through the interview process but make it clear that, since you have more experience than is common for an associate professor and since you had been a full professor before, you will not consider being hired at the associate professor level. Then they will have to figure out how much they want you to come. This isn't an entirely uncommon part of the negotiations process: When a university puts you on a short list, they've decided that you would probably be a good match for their institution, and they want to hire you. It's clear to everyone that they have to give something in this process, be it salary negotiations, startup money, or in your case the title they give you. It is not unreasonable for someone who had been a full prof before to ask that they be hired at the full prof level again; if that's the red line that you draw and the university is not willing to meet it, then you know what you need to do: Walk away.

2
  • 1
    Agree. Treat it as an opening gambit in a negotiating process. Tenure at hire is a reasonable demand, for example.
    – Buffy
    Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 14:05
  • 1
    I once switched and insisted on retaining full rank. But also accepted a two year probationary period, which turned out to be pro-forma.
    – Buffy
    Commented Apr 5, 2022 at 14:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .