0

If I draw a figure freehand, and then ask somebody else to render it digitally, and integrate the resulting product in a publication, what is the correct way of acknowledging this person's work?

Should I mention their name

  1. As a co-author,
  2. In the acknowledgments,
  3. In the caption of the figure ("Digital rendering by Doe, J.")
  4. Something else?
1
  • About 1. : why? If you go down that way, I guess you have to have as a co-author Mohammed ibn-Musa al-Khowarizmi, because he provided a good rendering of the idea of zero you have in mind :)
    – EarlGrey
    Commented Mar 18, 2022 at 14:08

1 Answer 1

2

Either 2 or 3 (or both) is proper. They haven't likely contributed to the intellectual content of the paper so 1 would not be required or advised. You did that when you drew the figure. Similarly reviewers and copy editors don't become authors.

If they put a lot of work into it, then both 2 and 3 would probably be best. And, for an acknowledgement, make sure you point to the figure if you don't also use a caption.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .