I am already at the end of my 2nd year of PhD studies. Currently, I do not have a publication in a journal; however, I have few published proceedings from conferences. I have chosen my own research topic, which is not a traditional PhD topic in my discipline, and I work mostly independently on it. Just for the set up.
The thing is, there are many interesting PhD workshops (basically conferences - you need to send a working paper), where I would love to attend just for the opportunity to meet other young scientists, see what they are working on (mainly to be able to compare it with my own research), present my own work, and similarly... Nevertheless, when I submit my work to them, I get rejected, almost always. No feedback given, only something bland such as: "we had many brilliant works, we had to reject few of them".
Well, noone needs to give me the feedback, I know, I know... So where is the problem...? The problem is that, recently, I have written an article I really love and believe in. Most importantly, the article is currently under review in one of the most prestigeous journals (D1), so I guess it has a merit (knowing that this journal does not hold back with desk rejections, as that was the fate of my previous article).
So, I feel a certain cognitive disonance: I send this paper to PhD workshops and it gets rejected, however more prestigeous entity gives it a chance?
How shall I read this?
- Is my paper bad and the journal just honors me with a review process since I already tried to send something there?
- Is my research so specific that conference committees do not give it a chance but the journal does?
- May committees focus primarilly on CVs? Do they accept only people who have already published in journal?
- What do PhD workshops even look for?