Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 16, 2021 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1438291541475438597
Sep 15, 2021 at 21:07 history became hot network question
Sep 15, 2021 at 18:53 comment added Nobody @gnometorule Well, if I had a firm answer to that, I wouldn't have had to ask the question. You are, of course, right that fighting over this would cost time and aggravation and gain me nothing directly, but then again what good are ethics and norms if we don't enforce them? We know from behavioral economics that people do sometimes incur tangible costs to enforce norms, and if you've ever been in such a situation it's easy to see why. There is something deeply distasteful about watching somebody behaving unethically and just getting away with it.
Sep 15, 2021 at 18:53 answer added Rob timeline score: 4
Sep 15, 2021 at 15:08 comment added Captain Emacs It's inappropriate to put you on the paper if you wish to be off it. Maybe the authors feared to be even more inappropriate to leave you off, but didn't want to kill the paper (which, strictly spoken, they would have had to do if you refuse to be an author but substantially contributed to it). A dilemma. Unless the quality of the paper is substandard, you disagree with the conclusions or you really didn't contribute at all (but why would they add you then), you might let it slide. If you hate the authors, it means you do not want to work with them in the future. But this work is done.
Sep 15, 2021 at 14:06 comment added gnometorule Assuming the paper looks fine, and given that you were, in fact, a contributor, would you rather be (ethically) right and fight incorrect process, or at peace and keep what was in the past, in the past, while focusing on your current life and career?
Sep 15, 2021 at 13:11 answer added Buffy timeline score: 11
S Sep 15, 2021 at 13:03 review First questions
Sep 15, 2021 at 13:04
S Sep 15, 2021 at 13:03 history asked Nobody CC BY-SA 4.0