Timeline for Former colleagues listed me as a coauthor on a paper without consulting me. Should I make an issue of it, or let it go?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 15, 2021 at 18:56 | comment | added | Nobody | ... "That's an interesting approach, but I don't think it's quite right. Here's how I would do it instead." | |
Sep 15, 2021 at 18:55 | comment | added | Nobody | Thanks for your perspective. It's a little ironic, this coming up now, after we butted heads over almost this very topic a couple weeks ago. (FWIW, the conversation with the go-between was a big part of what I had in mind when I was arguing with you then.) I think you're right about letting it go. I skimmed the paper, and it's fine. Not very good, IMO, but nothing obviously wrong. They used an algorithm that I developed. The worst I can say about it is that they didn't cite the paper that inspired the algorithm, but the algorithm wasn't directly based on the other paper; it was more like ... | |
Sep 15, 2021 at 13:11 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |