I benchmarked sitaram's answer, Peter Cordes's comment, Fanatique's answer, and harrymc's answer, but this answer has the fastest way.
Averages:
- Deltik's answer* – 7.480 seconds
* Credit to Peter Cordes for suggesting parallelism
- sitaram's answer – 12.962 seconds (73.275% slower than best)
- Peter Cordes's comment – 14.414 seconds (92.685% slower than best)
- Fanatique's answer – 14.570 seconds (94.772% slower than best)
- harrymc's updated answer – 14.791 seconds (97.730% slower than best)
- harrymc's original answer – 1061.926 seconds (14096.113% slower than best)
Full statistical summary:
Author N min q1 median q3 max mean stddev
------------------ -- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Deltik 10 7.121 7.3585 7.4615 7.558 8.005 7.4804 0.248965
sitaram 10 12.651 12.803 12.943 13.0685 13.586 12.9617 0.276589
Peter Cordes 10 14.096 14.2875 14.375 14.4495 15.101 14.4136 0.269732
Fanatique 10 14.219 14.512 14.5615 14.6525 14.892 14.5697 0.211788
harrymc (updated) 10 14.38 14.677 14.8595 14.9025 15.119 14.791 0.21817
harrymc (original) 1 1061.93 1061.93 1061.93 1061.93 1061.93 1061.93 N/A
Deltik's command, in benchmark format:
find "$(pwd)" -type d -print0 | xargs -0 -P4 chmod 755 & \
find "$(pwd)" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -P4 chmod 644 & wait
sitaram's command, in benchmark format:
chmod -R a=,u+rwX,go+rX "$(pwd)"
Peter Cordes's command, in benchmark format:
find "$(pwd)" \( -type d -exec chmod 755 {} + \) \
-o \( -type f -exec chmod 644 {} + \)
Fanatique's command, in benchmark format:
find "$(pwd)" -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 755 ; \
find "$(pwd)" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 644
harrymc's updated command, in benchmark format:
find "$(pwd)" -type d -exec chmod 755 {} + ; \
find "$(pwd)" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} +
harrymc's original command, in benchmark format:
find "$(pwd)" -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \; ; \
find "$(pwd)" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
My command was the fastest thanks to the four parallel chmod
processes per file type. This allowed multiple CPU cores to run chmod
, which moves the bottleneck towards kernel I/O threads or the disk.
sitaram's command was the runner-up because everything is done within the chmod
command. This substantially reduces overhead compared to the other answers because:
- The files only need to be scanned once (similar to doing one
find
instead of two), and
- No child processes need to be created.
This command is the least flexible, however, because it relies on a trick involving the differing meaning of the executable bit between regular files and directories.
Peter Cordes's comment, which uses one find
command, prevents double lookups of directory entries. The more files there are, the more substantial this improvement is. It still has the overhead of creating child chmod
processes, which is why it is quite a bit slower than the chmod
-only solution.
Between Fanatique's command and harrymc's updated command, find
piped into xargs
(find | xargs
) was faster because the stream of results is processed asynchronously. Instead of find
pausing its find behavior for -exec
, the found results are sent to xargs
for concurrent processing.
(The null byte delimiter (find -print0 | xargs -0
) did not seem to affect running time.)
harrymc's original command was too slow because of the overhead of a new chmod
command for every single file and folder, each executed in sequence.
In the test setup, there were 1000002 regular files contained within 1001 directories:
root@demo:~# echo {0..999} | xargs mkdir -p
root@demo:~# find -type d -exec bash -c "cd {}; echo {0..999} | xargs touch" \;
root@demo:~# find | wc -l
1001003
root@demo:~# find -type d | wc -l
1001
root@demo:~# find -type f | wc -l
1000002
I set all of the files and folders to have 777
permissions, like the initial conditions of the question.
Then, I benchmarked the commands ten times, each time restoring the permissions to 777
with chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)"
before running the test.
With OUTPUT
representing a file that contains the output of each benchmark command, I calculated the average time using:
bc <<< "scale=3; ($(grep real OUTPUT | grep -Po '(?<=m).*(?=s)' | xargs | sed 's/ /+/g'))/10"
Results of the benchmark of Deltik's answer
root@demo:~# for i in {0..9} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time { find "$(pwd)" -type d -print0 | xargs -0 -P4 chmod 755 & find "$(pwd)" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -P4 chmod 644 & wait ; } ; done
[1] 9791
[2] 9793
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.634s
user 0m2.536s
sys 0m23.384s
[1] 9906
[2] 9908
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.443s
user 0m2.636s
sys 0m23.106s
[1] 10021
[2] 10023
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m8.005s
user 0m2.672s
sys 0m24.557s
[1] 10136
[2] 10138
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.480s
user 0m2.541s
sys 0m23.699s
[1] 10251
[2] 10253
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.397s
user 0m2.558s
sys 0m23.583s
[1] 10366
[2] 10368
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.482s
user 0m2.601s
sys 0m23.728s
[1] 10481
[2] 10483
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.679s
user 0m2.749s
sys 0m23.395s
[1] 10596
[2] 10598
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.243s
user 0m2.583s
sys 0m23.400s
[1] 10729
[2] 10731
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.320s
user 0m2.640s
sys 0m23.403s
[1] 10844
[2] 10847
[1]- Done find "$(pwd)" -type d | xargs -P4 chmod 755
[2]+ Done find "$(pwd)" -type f | xargs -P4 chmod 644
real 0m7.121s
user 0m2.490s
sys 0m22.943s
Average time: 7.480 seconds
Results of the benchmark of sitaram's answer
root@demo:~# for i in {0..9} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time chmod -R a=,u+rwX,go+rX "$(pwd)" ; done
real 0m12.860s
user 0m0.940s
sys 0m11.725s
real 0m13.059s
user 0m0.896s
sys 0m11.937s
real 0m12.819s
user 0m0.945s
sys 0m11.706s
real 0m13.078s
user 0m0.855s
sys 0m12.000s
real 0m12.653s
user 0m0.856s
sys 0m11.667s
real 0m12.787s
user 0m0.820s
sys 0m11.834s
real 0m12.651s
user 0m0.916s
sys 0m11.578s
real 0m13.098s
user 0m0.939s
sys 0m12.004s
real 0m13.586s
user 0m1.024s
sys 0m12.372s
real 0m13.026s
user 0m0.976s
sys 0m11.910s
Average time: 12.962 seconds
Results of the benchmark of Peter Cordes's comment
root@demo:~# for i in {0..9} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time find "$(pwd)" \( -type d -exec chmod 755 {} + \) -o \( -type f -exec chmod 644 {} + \) ; done
real 0m14.096s
user 0m1.455s
sys 0m12.456s
real 0m14.492s
user 0m1.398s
sys 0m12.897s
real 0m14.309s
user 0m1.518s
sys 0m12.576s
real 0m14.451s
user 0m1.477s
sys 0m12.776s
real 0m15.101s
user 0m1.554s
sys 0m13.378s
real 0m14.223s
user 0m1.470s
sys 0m12.560s
real 0m14.266s
user 0m1.459s
sys 0m12.609s
real 0m14.357s
user 0m1.415s
sys 0m12.733s
real 0m14.393s
user 0m1.404s
sys 0m12.830s
real 0m14.448s
user 0m1.492s
sys 0m12.717s
Average time: 14.414 seconds
Results of the benchmark of Fanatique's answer
root@demo:~# for i in {0..9} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time { find "$(pwd)" -type d -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 755 ; find "$(pwd)" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chmod 644 ; } ; done
real 0m14.561s
user 0m1.991s
sys 0m13.343s
real 0m14.521s
user 0m1.958s
sys 0m13.352s
real 0m14.696s
user 0m1.967s
sys 0m13.463s
real 0m14.562s
user 0m1.875s
sys 0m13.400s
real 0m14.609s
user 0m1.841s
sys 0m13.533s
real 0m14.892s
user 0m2.050s
sys 0m13.630s
real 0m14.291s
user 0m1.885s
sys 0m13.182s
real 0m14.843s
user 0m2.066s
sys 0m13.578s
real 0m14.219s
user 0m1.837s
sys 0m13.145s
real 0m14.503s
user 0m1.803s
sys 0m13.419s
Average time: 14.570 seconds
Results of the benchmark of harrymc's updated answer
root@demo:~# for i in {0..9} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time { find "$(pwd)" -type d -exec chmod 755 {} + ; find "$(pwd)" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} + ; } ; done
real 0m14.975s
user 0m1.728s
sys 0m13.050s
real 0m14.710s
user 0m1.586s
sys 0m12.979s
real 0m14.644s
user 0m1.641s
sys 0m12.872s
real 0m14.927s
user 0m1.706s
sys 0m13.036s
real 0m14.867s
user 0m1.597s
sys 0m13.086s
real 0m15.119s
user 0m1.666s
sys 0m13.259s
real 0m14.878s
user 0m1.590s
sys 0m13.098s
real 0m14.852s
user 0m1.681s
sys 0m13.045s
real 0m14.380s
user 0m1.603s
sys 0m12.663s
real 0m14.558s
user 0m1.514s
sys 0m12.899s
Average time: 14.791 seconds
Results of the benchmark of harrymc's original answer
Due to how slow this command was, I only ran the benchmark once.
root@demo:~# for i in {0..0} ; do chmod -R 0777 "$(pwd)" ; time { find "$(pwd)" -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \; ; find "$(pwd)" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \; ; } ; done
real 17m41.926s
user 12m26.896s
sys 4m58.332s
Time taken: 1061.926 seconds
rsync
will not use the special APIs required to maintain those. Usepax
, that's what it's for.