Timeline for Understanding how RAM and throughput work with expansion slots
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2017 at 13:52 | answer | added | AdamKalisz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 25, 2016 at 15:20 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Mar 25, 2016 at 15:20 | |||||
| Mar 17, 2016 at 22:04 | comment | added | airkeyahguh | @ramhound well there you go. that is your fault not mine. I like that you keep deleting your other comments because you know that you sound ignorant as hell. | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 20:27 | comment | added | Ramhound | @airkeyahguh - I stopped reading your original comment at "script kiddie" | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 19:40 | comment | added | airkeyahguh | @ChrisInEdmonton Thank you both for your help I appreciate it! | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 19:33 | comment | added | Ramhound | @airkeyahguh - I read your last comment; I just see you complaining about my question, but whatever, its not important. I will just delete my comments and move on, I have many things I want to say, but have decided I won't say them. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 4:11 | answer | added | Jonno | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 4:03 | comment | added | picobit | Minimum ratings aren't useful, because your computer will have very little going most of the time. Your memory controller should have a maximum bandwidth that is greater than or equal to your memory's maximum rating. It's not the end of the world if your RAM is faster than your motherboard, because your RAM will be happy to serve up bits just as slowly as your motherboard asks for them. You'll just be leaving potential performance on the table, that's all. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 3:57 | history | edited | airkeyahguh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 8, 2016 at 3:49 | comment | added | airkeyahguh | Or rather the expansion slot | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 3:47 | comment | added | airkeyahguh | @Ramhound so does this mean that the motherboard would need a minimum throughput of 21gb p/second? | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 1:45 | comment | added | airkeyahguh | @ChrisInEdmonton So the 32gb is to indicate how much information can be held at any given time, and the 21gb is to indicate how much information can be transferred per-second? Where am I confusing bits with Bytes? | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 1:42 | comment | added | ChrisInEdmonton | You are confusing speed with capacity. Also, you are confusing 'b' (bits) with 'B' (bytes). | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 1:37 | history | asked | airkeyahguh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |