Questions tagged [quantum-electrodynamics]
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the quantum field theory believed to describe electromagnetic interaction. It is the simplest example of a quantum gauge theory, where the gauge group is abelian, U(1).
2,346
questions
2
votes
1
answer
49
views
Parametric down-conversion - QFT necessary?
In quantum optics, one ususally starts by quantizing the free electric field and obtains an expression for the electric field operators:
$$ E(\vec{r},t) = \sum_{\vec{k},p} C_{\vec{k}} \vec{e}_{\vec{k},...
-2
votes
0
answers
62
views
QED with massless fermions
Consider QED such that physical mass of fermions vanishes. Is it true that their bare mass also vanishes?
2
votes
0
answers
31
views
Link between photon helicity and polarization of $A^\mu$ electromagnetic potential
From Wigner theorem we know that the irreducible unitary representation of the Poincarè group for massless and spin 1 particle is labelled by the momentum $p_\mu$ and the two possible helicity $+1,-1$ ...
7
votes
1
answer
651
views
Photon propagator in path integral vs. operator formalism
I am self-studying the book "Quantum field theory and the standard model" by Schwartz, and I am really confused about the derivation of the Photon propagator on page 128-129.
He starts ...
0
votes
1
answer
37
views
Calculating a Feynman diagram with the helicity basis
In the book by Peskin and Schroeder, they calculate the leading order diagram for the process $e^- e^+ \to \mu^- \mu^+$ (see page 136 for the labelling of the momenta). They do this in two ways: using ...
3
votes
1
answer
57
views
Independence of $S$-matrix of $\xi$-gauge in QED
On page 298 in Peskin and Schroeder, the authors attempt to argue that the $S$-matrix should be independent of the $\xi$-gauge in QED. However, I don't understand their argument, in particular the ...
5
votes
1
answer
74
views
$ \pi^0\to \gamma\gamma$ parity conservation
Let's consider the decay process $\pi^0\to \gamma \gamma$. After we spontaneously broke the chiral symmetry of QCD coupled to an abelian gauge field $A^\mu$, we end up with the Goldstone boson ...
-3
votes
1
answer
95
views
Some calculation in Schwartz's Quantum field theory eq. (16.39)
In Schwartz's Quantum field theory and the standard model, p.307 he derives a formula:
$$ \Pi_2^{\mu \nu} = \frac{-2 e^2}{(4 \pi )^{d/2}}(p^2g^{\mu\nu}-p^{\mu}p^{\nu})\Gamma(2- \frac{d}{2}) \mu^{4-d} \...
3
votes
1
answer
130
views
Weisskopf and self-energy
I am working my way through the 1934 paper by Weisskopf on the self-energy of the electron and is much helped by the English translation found here. I do have some difficulties with section 2 of this ...
0
votes
1
answer
82
views
Is it possible to lower the energy of the vacuum?
The energy of the vacuum is given by $$\sum_k \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega_k.$$ However the frequency $\omega_k$ depends on the wavevector $k$ and some constants like the speed of light $c$, which in turn ...
-2
votes
1
answer
59
views
What is the energy of a photon in an electron-muon scattering?
Currently I am reading about this process in an Introduction to Quantum Field Theory by Peskin and Schroeder (pages 153-154). It should be mentioned that they are working in a center-of-mass (CM) ...
0
votes
0
answers
37
views
Unitary Gauge Removing Goldstone Bosons
The Lagrangian in a spontaneously broken gauge theory at low energies looks like
$$ \frac{1}{2} m^2 ( \partial_\mu \theta - A_\mu )^2 $$
and the gauge transformations look like $\theta \rightarrow \...
1
vote
2
answers
108
views
How is light interference explained with photons?
In the classical model of light as an EM wave, interference is a trivial consequence of the linearity of the wave equation. Now, if we model light as collections of photons, how is light interference ...
1
vote
1
answer
102
views
Feynman rule for scalar QED vertex
A popular problem in QFT textbooks and courses is to derive the Feynman rules for scalar QED. Usually, this theory is presented via the following Lagrangian density:
$$\mathcal{L} = (D_\mu\phi)^\...
1
vote
0
answers
21
views
Particle and momentum Flow for complex scalar or fermion field
When i look at complex scalar fields or fermion fields, i have my $\psi^\dagger$ as my anti particle and $\psi$ as my particle, same for $\phi^\dagger$ and $\phi$. When i now draw the Feynman diagrams ...