Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Ed Sheeran performs during a concert at the Ziggo Dome in Amsterdam
Artists such as Ed Sheeran could be in line for big paydays after a vote in Brussels over music streaming copyright laws. Photograph: Paul Bergen/AFP/Getty Images
Artists such as Ed Sheeran could be in line for big paydays after a vote in Brussels over music streaming copyright laws. Photograph: Paul Bergen/AFP/Getty Images

YouTube faces paying billions to music stars after copyright vote

This article is more than 6 years old

Platforms could have to seek licences for videos after European parliament action

YouTube stars from Taylor Swift to Ed Sheeran, Beyonce and Jay-Z could be in line for big paydays after the video giant lost a crucial vote in Brussels over new copyright laws that will force it to pay billions of dollars in fees for users watching music videos.

For years the music industry has argued that YouTube exploits the lack of legal protection around music videos being viewed on its service to pay minimal amounts to artists and labels when they are viewed. The music industry has lobbied that this “value gap” between the true worth of the music videos and what YouTube decides to pay needs to be addressed with legislation.

On Wednesday, a crucial vote by the European parliament’s legal affairs committee went the way of the music industry with an agreement to adopt copyright laws that will force platforms such as YouTube to seek licences for music videos.

“The importance of today’s vote cannot be overstated; this proposal is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a new balance in the online world,” said Helen Smith, the executive chair of the European music body Impala, which represents labels behind acts including Adele, Arctic Monkeys and Franz Ferdinand. “It is about copyright and making sure creators and their partners get a fair share of the value they create.”

YouTube has an estimated 1.3 billion users who regularly watch music videos and it paid $856m (£650m) in royalties to music companies last year – an estimated 67 cents per user annually. In the UK, record labels and artists earn more than double the royalties from the sale of 4.1m vinyl records than they did from the 25bn music videos watched on YouTube last year.

Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

By contrast, income from the 272 million music fans who paid for ad-supported services such as Spotify, generated $5.6bn in royalties, or about $20 per user annually.

While the legal affairs committee vote marks a landmark moment – it is the lead committee on the legislation that has been the subject of vociferous lobbying by tech companies and the music industry for 18 months – it will face a further challenge before becoming law. The committee voted 15 to 10 to adopt the controversial article 13.

It is expected that a challenge will be lodged by members of the European parliament opposed to it, which will result in the entire parliament voting in July to decide whether to approve or reject Wednesday’s result. A final vote on the adoption of the overall legislation will be made later in the year.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Why YouTubers are feeling the burn

  • Cheese and chips: parmesan producers fight fakes with microtransponders

  • 'Not again': the online artists accusing pop stars of stealing work

  • Can you learn to cook like a chef by watching YouTube?

  • Eurythmics' Dave Stewart sells music catalogue to Hipgnosis

  • YouTube ‘found footage’ docs: urban legends in their own words

  • FamilyOFive: YouTube bans 'pranksters' after child abuse conviction

  • MEPs accidentally vote wrong way on copyright law

  • What’s up PewdiePie? The troubling content of YouTube’s biggest star

  • What do major copyright changes mean for internet freedom?

Most viewed

Most viewed