Trevor Stolber’s Post

View profile for Trevor Stolber, graphic

Uncovering opportunity everywhere you are not

Like most SEOs I have been delving into reading about the Google documentation leak. I have a slightly different opinion and take on it than most seem to be having. Here are some observations I have made; 1) It's from a deprecated code base (still very interesting - but old and not used) 2) It's not actually from their ranking algorithm, it is an API used internally 3) We already knew most of the things that are in there 4) There is a lot of public information that confirms some of the things in here 5) You have to question the timing - Google needed a distraction 6) This looks a lot like the Yandex leak to me - which I did not buy was real 7) I don't believe you would have a variable for good clicks and bad clicks, you would have a value for a variable called clicks which the valuer would indicate good or bad 8) Good production code documentation would specify ranges and values - I see none of that here 9) Google doesn't use DA (Domain Authority) - DA is an analog to PR (Page Rank) which was Google's stand-out differentiator - I am not sure why so much attention is being paid to these nuances. 10) This SEO is not buying it! I remain open-minded, these are my initial observations and opinions. Would love to discuss more. #SEO #Google #Leak #API #Code

Markus Duetsch

E-commerce SEO - #seo #ecommerce #webshop

2mo

I think it was and is important to test and verify what works well for a website and what does not. No matter what Google says or does not say or lies about. For example: Reading about that there is a sandbox - what can you do about it? How will this imact or change you SEO strategy? Knowing about usage of click data and user behaviour - what does this make you do different now? Will any of this matter at all when SGE and AI overviews dominate the SERP? Anyways. Lets focus on the things we can influence. We cannot influence if Google uses Authority Scores or bashes small personal sites. But we can build a website users enjoy using and visiting. A website that loads fast and makes products easy to find and gives helpful information to help the user make his/ her descision. One has to bear in mind that Google's number one interest and goal is to show ads to users and make them click these ads. This is the main income source of any search engine. To achive that goal search engines need ads matching the users intent and search request as well as good (helpful) organic search results to build trust to make the user return and use the search engine again and again.

Carmen Domínguez Rodríguez

Head of Organic - International & Ecommerce SEO - Judge at the European & UK Search Awards. Foodie, runner and feminist 🇺🇦

2mo

that's kind of what I was thinking - is it really a leak? I can't see anything new there that we didn't know already from either the european trial and...experience. I guess let's not get distracted from keeping exposing AI Overviews for what it is, something that actually follows none of those ranking factors🧐🤥

Derek Chew

Building cross-channel strategies to elevate brands.

2mo

this looks like a definition list, perhaps?

Nate Tower

President at Perrill | Powering businesses to win online

2mo

Number three is really all we need to say here. People are spending a lot of time talking about things we already know.

Kristine Schachinger

Consultant | SEO, Technical SEO, SEO Website Audits, Growth Strategies, Google Penalty Recovery, Accessibility, Usability, LLMs, & Social Media

2mo

I agree see my repost.

Patricia L. Johnson

Digital Marketing Manager At Design Hub 360 Custom T-Shirts & Apparel. Recently featured on Fox 2 St. Louis

2mo

Does seems like its a dstraction from something, especially after Search regarding AI...

Costin Nachiu

SEO Strategist| WordPress Professional | Social Media - Bing, Google, SEMrush, Waze and Yandex certified.

2mo

All that so you can rank after Reddit!

Maddy French

Founder @ The Blogsmith content agency | Bestselling Author "Writing for Humans and Robots"

2mo

Very interesting take, Trevor!

Gabrielle Martin

Digital Marketing | Social Media | GabbySEO.com

2mo

Love your points here. Happy to see the alternative view on this and glad I'm not the only one questioning some of this information. I definitely agree on the deprecation mention - it's not clear what is deprecated or how it connects on the whole... we have these documents with no context beyond their internal discussion. There's no way for us to connect the dots and see what's going on as a system. Everything else inexplicitly stated is left to interpretation. From a technical standpoint that's a lot. However number 4... I agree the timing is strange. I don't think Google needs any more distractions though. I think the opposite. There are many disgruntled ex employees.. and even more under significant tension. I think it is the opposite case here.

Kristine Schachinger

Consultant | SEO, Technical SEO, SEO Website Audits, Growth Strategies, Google Penalty Recovery, Accessibility, Usability, LLMs, & Social Media

2mo

I have been reading the raw dump and they are all dated 2019 and there is literally nothing you can gather from 90% of the pages -- I so agree.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics