Tom Roach’s Post

View profile for Tom Roach, graphic

VP Brand Strategy at Jellyfish

There’s a new ‘share of’ in town. ‘Share of model’. A new marketing metric for the GenAI age. More in the article below. Includes a bit of history on the ‘share ofs’ it follows on from - share of market, share of voice, ESOV and share of search. Jellyfish The Brandtech Group Marketing Week https://lnkd.in/edzVVd_q

‘Share of model’ is the new marketing measure for the AI era

‘Share of model’ is the new marketing measure for the AI era

marketingweek.com

Srecko Sekeljic

Head of B2B Marketing at Vega IT

3w

Tom, just recently a B2B inbound lead told us that we’ve been recommended to them by the ChatGPT 🤖 That’s when I realized that, sooner or later, everyone’s going to opt in for a “Model Optimisation Strategy”, in order to increase what you call a brand’s “Share of Model”. But this would have a different use than the Share of Search, which is used as a proxy metric for assesing the existing mental availability of a brand. It seams that the “Share of Model” would indicate how likely it is for an audience to be exposed to the brand while using an LLM. So, it seams to be similar to SEO ranking — in a sense that it enables discoverability. But the “Share of Model” would at the same time count as earned media, which we can’t say about a brand’s own SEO ranking. And, better than just being discovered, “Share of Model” would also serve as a source of social proof — and even as an effective recommendation engine (which we experienced firsthand at Vega IT). I don’t know if these☝️random thoughts make sense, but I’d love to hear your opinion 🤔

Bruce Clark

Associate Professor of Marketing at D'Amore-McKim School of Business at Northeastern University

3w

This is a great idea, but I'm wary of producing a number from LLMs. Test prompt: List all the brands in the car industry. You'll get a list. Ask AI to rewrite. You will get a slightly different list. Which one should be in the number?

Andrew Tindall

The World’s Best Ads & Why They Work | SVP @ System1 | Marketing Effectiveness

3w

Great bit of thinking - I believe the (slow) speed LLMs are built/refreshed means that such a way of measurement would lead to out of date findings? Unless we see a future of OPEN AI doing weekly updates. Kind of my issue with using AI for research, hard to understand how it got to that outcome/figure and you've no idea of the time periods. But cheap and fast so has it's uses!

Anna O'Riordan

Providing more than a fraction of Marketing support | CMO | Marketing Director | Brand & Marketing Consultant

3w

Self-confessed Luddite who is far from expert in anything AI but this one will take some convincing - For starters, how will ‘share of model’ metrics differentiate the ‘organic’ references to brand from those generated by the many professionals using LLMs to support their work…? And how will the likes of Search and Web Traffic rankings skew what LLMs pull and feature? Appreciate early days but this has thrown up so many questions in my little mind…

Prof. dr. Koen Pauwels

best marketing academic on the planet, ex-Amazon, IJMR editor-in-chief, vice dean of research at DMSB. Helping people avoid bad choices and make best choices in retail media and marketing.

3w

thanks for writing and posting! I though 'share of model' (also) meant share of the attribution model for publishers, i.e. to what extent does the attribution model recognizes your contribution Gabriel Mohanna

★ Jeff Fryer

B2B Fractional CMO + AI Strategist | Head of Marketing | Small + Medium Size Business Growth Expert for 15+ years

3w

Really love the idea, Tom. As it stands, there's no clear, reliable way to actually measure what's being proposed with the tools at hand. But I look forward to someone taking up the torch to make this a practical reality!

Ben Lunt

Founding partner, FLUX.Monks

3w

I have nothing to say at this stage other than “this is excellent” 👏🏻

Daniel Vargas Gómez, PhD

Global Strategy Director at Boomerang, Publicis Groupe

3w

This really shows how little marketers understand LLMs, starting from the most obvious fact which is that most brand mentions happen in spaces like Social Media, YouTube, Media outlets, etc., all of which are currently NOT part of a model’s pretraining data (And they also happen in regular conversations which are ofc not part of that data either). If you don’t understand the basics forget about the rest.

Like
Reply
Byron Sharp

Research Professor (Marketing Science), Director Ehrenberg-Bass Institute, Adelaide University of South Australia.

3w

Hi Tom. This bit is wrong: The key insight in all this work was that brands investing more in media than their market share implied were much more likely to grow their market share over the longer term.

Lynn Melling

video storyteller & strategist @ 515 Productions, a creative video production collective

3w

Tom Roach Fascinating. If I'm reading this correctly, it seems like this could be a solution for measuring the effectiveness of marcom activities across owned, earned, paid and shared. And also build in KPIs around brand trust. Am I getting that right? The trouble with ESOV is it leaves out owned, earned and organic social content. And the trouble with measuring share of search/mental availability is, it leaves out if people know about the brand for the right reasons (because they like it and want to buy it). This new model seems like it has the potential of being a magic bullet that PR and owned content folks have been desperately waiting for.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics