Recently, tech social media blew up with a discussion of whether we need AI control systems (or whatever you want to call them*). Again.
The sensationalist takes could be approximately summarized as:
“We’d better do something urgently so AGI doesn’t outsmart us!”
versus
“AI is still pretty dumb, chill out.”
I’d like to offer a perpendicular perspective in the linked blog post I wrote for you. (In which we both chill out and build something.) In short:
"Nevermind AGI, GenAI, or anything AI. We're not smart enough to design, build, and steer complex technology responsibly and technology is getting more complex quickly. Let's build tools that make us more capable."
Or, more bluntly:
"Have you noticed that the people in charge are never the human-in-the-loop? There's a loop they need to be in... and they're not there."
*For the semantics fan club, I put a glossary of 57 AI-control-related terms for you at the bottom of the blog post. If you're tempted to argue about word meanings, please enjoy those first. 57 of them should surely provide all the nuance you can guzzle in one go. And color-coded too! <3
Marketing and corporate communications professional
3wWhat!! Were you at Philips / NXP with Terry Chiang 江秋霞 ? I’m so confused!