Konul Shugubova’s Post

An interesting #structuredfinance #risktransfer solution is gaining momentum in the #banking #industry. In April, the #IFC announced #Synthetic #SignificantRiskTransfer (Synthetic #SRT) transaction with #BNPParibas Poland. The transaction consisted of #mezzanine exposure of IFC to a $548 million equivalent #creditportfolio of the BNPP Poland. Earlier in 2023, the #EuropeanInvestmentBank (#EIB) Group provided a €175 million guarantee to #LBBW covering the €3.2 billion SME and corporate loan portfolio. The same year, the #EBRD provided €25.6 million in credit protection to RBA (the Croatian subsidiary of #Raiffeisen Bank International AG) covering a €366 million-worth portfolio of SME and corporate loans. On the #European market, these deals are just a few to name. Synthetic SRT becomes a useful tool for banks in their #capitaloptimization #strategy. Several significant #Europeanbanks have already embedded SRT #securitisation programmes in their regular capital and business planning. It enables banks to enhance capital resilience and increase #lending capacity. It helps banks to lower the #riskweights on their #assetexposures by transferring the #creditrisk of the #assetportfolio to investors. What is the usual transactional structure? A bank identifies a reference pool of assets and transfers the #risk of #default of 5% to 15% of this portfolio to an investor. The pool of assets can contain a wide range of #debt types, such as #tradefinance, #mortgage #loans, #infrastructure and #projectfinance loans, etc. In the event a materialized loss occurs, investors bear the loss. The synthetic nature of the transaction allows the bank to keep the designated loan portfolio on its own balance sheet selling the investor a #creditprotection agreement. Institutional investors are typical participants in SRT transactions. They receive periodic #floating-rate #couponpayments usually structured as #SOFR + fixed premium. Major risks for investors are the illiquid nature of the instrument and the risk of loss of the principal. A significant advantage is that large investors can potentially negotiate the characteristics of the underlying pool of assets. In the US, with the failure of Sillicon Valley Bank, banks interest in this investment product is increasing. In September 2023, the US Federal Reserve issued SRT guidance on its relevance to #regulatorycapital rules. Compared to conventional instruments like #AT1 #bonds and #commonequity, SRT provides banks with a cost-effective way to free up #capital without diluting existing investors' #equity. Generally speaking, in light of the tightening #regulatorycapital requirements for banks and the urgent topic of #climateinitiative financing, the Synthetic SRT becomes a practical financial instrument and investment solution, bringing together various #institutional market players, including #internationalfinancialinstitutions, #commercialbanks, and #institutionalinvestors.

IFC, BNP Paribas Bank Polska Launch SRT Transaction to Increase Climate Finance in Poland

pressroom.ifc.org

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics