We used to publish 5 articles a month for SEO clients, because it fitted neatly into our 'monthly package'. But then we flipped it... We decided to front-load resource and publish 10-50 articles month 1 (depending on budget). By month 6 it made us look like geniuses. There's no benefit to drip feeding content (besides budget constraints). It's better to start the ranking countdown timer ASAP. It's the difference between achieving results month 6 or month 18.
Agree with this 100%. There’s no time to drip feed with seo, it’s about what do you need to do in order to actually make an impact.
Indeed, of the site is reflecting the progress and new content are getting discovered on 1,2,3 page — publish.
Great point, Joe. If you have the content, why hold back?!
Something that I always advocate to my clients. (When they're looking for results and not worried about budget, of course.lol). Joe Davies
SEO Consultant | SaaS Link Builder | Content Manager | Content Marketer | Content Writer
1moDo you like to publish content in pattern or patternless way? Like 2 every week. Or like 1 today and 4 tomorrow and 15 next week. Sort of randomness?