Faegre Drinker’s Post

View organization page for Faegre Drinker, graphic

14,115 followers

In explaining the amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the Advisory Committee called out several ways in which “many courts” had “incorrectly” applied Rule 702 and failed to adequately discharge their duty as gatekeepers with regard to expert witness testimony. The import of those comments is that existing precedent on Rule 702 may be “incorrect” and must be re-examined. A case pending in the Northern District of Illinois serves as a fine illustration of how this re-examination should work in practice. You can learn more in this post for our “Faegre Drinker on Products” blog by Eric Friedman and Brian J. Paul.

Illinois Court Holds Seventh Circuit Precedent Incompatible With Rule 702 as Amended

Illinois Court Holds Seventh Circuit Precedent Incompatible With Rule 702 as Amended

https://www.faegredrinkeronproducts.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics