John Ennis

Ennis, J. M., & Christensen, R. (2015). A Thurstonian comparison of the Tetrad and Degree of Difference tests. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 263-269.

Ennis, J. M., Rousseau, B., & Ennis, D. M. (2014). Sensory difference tests as measurement instruments: A review of recent advances. Journal of sensory studies, 29(2), 89-102.

Christensen, R. H. B., Ennis, J. M., Ennis, D. M., & Brockhoff, P. B. (2014). Paired preference data with a no-preference option–Statistical tests for comparison with placebo data. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 48-55.

Ennis, J. M., & Christensen, R. H. (2014). Precision of measurement in Tetrad testing. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 98-106.

Jesionka, V., Rousseau, B., & Ennis, J. M. (2014). Transitioning from proportion of discriminators to a more meaningful measure of sensory difference. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 77-82.

Rousseau, B., & Ennis, J. M. (2013). Importance of correct instructions in the Tetrad test. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(4), 264-269.

Ennis, D. M., & Ennis, J. M. (2013). Mapping hedonic data: A process perspective. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(4), 324-334.

Ennis, J. M. (2013). The year of the tetrad test. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(4), 257-258.

Ennis, D.M., & Ennis, J.M. (2013) Analysis and Thurstonian scaling of applicability scores. Journal of Sensory Studies. 28(3), 188-193.

Ennis, J.M. and Ennis, D.M. (2013). A Thurstonian ranking model with rank-induced dependencies. Journal of Classification, 30, 124-147.

Jervis, S. M., Ennis, J. M., and Drake, M. A. (2012) A comparison of adaptive choice-based conjoint and choice-based conjoint to determine key choice attributes of sour cream with limited sample size. Journal of Sensory Studies. 27, 451-462.

Ennis, J.M., & Ennis, D.M. (2012) A comparison of three commonly used methods for treating no preference votes. Journal of Sensory Studies, 27(2), 123-129.

Nestrud, M. A., Ennis, J. M., and Lawless, H. T. (2012). A group level validation of the supercombinatorality property: Finding high-quality ingredient combinations using pairwise information. Food Quality and Preference, 25, 23-28.

Garcia, K., Ennis, J.M., and Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2012) A large-scale experimental comparison of the tetrad and triangle tests in children. Journal of Sensory Studies. 27, 217–222.

Ennis, D. M. and Ennis, J. M. (2012). Accounting for no difference/preference responses or ties in choice experiments. Food Quality and Preference, 23(1), 13-17.

Ennis, J.M., Fayle, C.M. & Ennis, D.M. (2012) Assignment-minimum clique coverings. Journal of Experimental Algorithmics. 17(1), 1.5:1-1.5:17.

Ennis, J. M., Fayle, C. M., and Ennis, D. M. (2012). eTURF: A competitive TURF algorithm for large datasets. Food Quality and Preference, 23(1), 44-48.

Ennis, J.M. (2012) Guiding the switch from triangle testing to tetrad testing. Journal of Sensory Studies. 27, 223–231.

Ennis, J.M., & Ennis, D.M. (2012) Justifying count-based comparisons. Journal of Sensory Studies, 27(2), 130-136.

Ennis, J.M. and Ennis, D.M. (2011). Confidence Bounds for Multiplicative Comparisons. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 40(17), 3049-3054.

Ennis, J. M. and Jesionka, V. (2011). The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited. Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(5), 371-382.

Nestrud, M. A., Ennis, J. M., Fayle, C. M., Ennis, D. M., and Lawless, H. T. (2011). Validating a graph theoretic screening approach to food item combinations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(5), 331-338.

Ennis, J. M. and Wei, G. (2010). Describing the universal cover of a noncompact limit. Geometry & Topology, 14, 2479-2496.

Ennis, D.M. and Ennis, J.M. (2010). Equivalence hypothesis testing. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 253-256.

Ennis, D. M. and Ennis, J. M. (2010). Equivalence hypothesis testing: Reply to Bi. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 261.

Ennis, D.M. and Ennis, J.M. (2009). Hypothesis testing for equivalence based on symmetric open intervals. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 38(11), 1792-1803.

Ennis, D., Ennis, J., Palen, J., Lampe, R. (2008). Confidence bounds for positive ratios of normal random variables. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37, 307-317.

Ashby, F.G., Ennis, J. and Spiering, B. (2007). A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. Psychological Review, 114(3), 632-656.

Ennis, J. and Wei, G. (2006). Describing the universal cover of a compact limit. Differential Geometry and its Applications, 24(5), 554–562.

Ashby, F.G. and Ennis, J. (2006). The role of the basal ganglia in category learning. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 46, 1-36.

Bi, J., Templeton-Janik, L., Ennis, J. M., and Ennis, D. M. (2000). Replicated difference and preference tests: How to account for inter-trial variation. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 269-273.

Ennis, J. M., Ennis, D. M., Yip, D. and O'Mahony, M. (1998). Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 51, 205-215.

Ennis, J.M. (In Press) A Thurstonian Analysis of the Two-Out-of-Five Test. Journal of Sensory Studies.

Worch, T., & Ennis, J.M. (2013). Investigating the single ideal assumption using Ideal Profile Method. Food Quality and Preference, 29(1), 40-47.

Ennis, D.M., & Ennis, J.M. (In Press) Mapping Hedonic Data: A Process Perspective. Journal of Sensory Studies.

Christensen, R.H.B., Ennis, J.M., Ennis, D.M., & Brockhoff, P.B. (In Press) Paired preference data with a no-preference option – Statistical tests for comparison with placebo data. Food Quality and Preference.

Ennis, J.M, & Christensen, R.H.B. (In Press) Precision of measurement in Tetrad testing. Food Quality and Preference.

Rousseau, B., & Ennis, J.M. (In Press) The Importance of Correct Instructions in the Tetrad Test. Journal of Sensory Studies.

Ennis, J.M. (In Press) The Year of the Tetrad Test. Journal of Sensory Studies.

Jesionka, V., Rosseau, B., & Ennis, J.M. (In Press) Transitioning from proportion of discriminators to a more meaningful measure of sensory difference. Food Quality and Preference.