We are very excited to welcome the newest members of the Wake Forest Law Review. Join us in congratulating these outstanding students.
Wake Forest Law Review
Law Practice
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 657 followers
The Wake Forest Law Review is a student-run organization that publishes scholarly legal articles in print and online.
About us
The Wake Forest Law Review is a student-run organization that publishes scholarly legal articles in print and online. We contribute to the academic and professional legal conversation with five print issues annually, monthly scholarly articles online, and regular short-form online posts by our Board and Staff on nascent legal issues. We also host symposia every year focusing on current topics in the legal community. The Wake Forest Law Review is composed entirely of current students at the Wake Forest University School of Law. We select students with demonstrated excellence in legal studies, research, and writing to join the Law Review.
- Website
-
http://wakeforestlawreview.com
External link for Wake Forest Law Review
- Industry
- Law Practice
- Company size
- 51-200 employees
- Headquarters
- Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Type
- Nonprofit
- Founded
- 1965
Locations
-
Primary
1834 Wake Forest Rd
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109, US
Employees at Wake Forest Law Review
Updates
-
The doctrine of divisibility is well known in contract law, yet there is little discussion by courts and scholars of reverse divisibility, which involves the recharacterization of two or more facially separate but closely related contracts as a single contract. In "'Reverse Divisibility' and 'Subsequent Modification': Expanding the Scope of Justified Non-Performance in Multiple Contract Situations," Professor Gregory Crespi discusses reverse divisibility and its practical applications. https://lnkd.in/eGG-r3dv
-
Should "professional speech" be a separate category of speech subject to a lower standard of review than strict scrutiny? In her note, "NIFLA and the Argument Against Professional Speech," Executive Editor Caroline Willcox answers in the negative. She contends that the existing exceptions to strict scrutiny are adequately broad to allow for state police power protection while maintaining the strength of the First Amendment, even in the professional sphere. https://lnkd.in/e2kct78d
NIFLA and the Argument Against “Professional Speech” - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Recently, the Biden Administration announced a new rule from the EPA that places strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions. This rule has potential challengers, citing agency overreach under the major questions doctrine. Wake Forest Law Review 2L Board Member Ryan Valerio discusses the major questions doctrine in the context of environmental regulation. https://lnkd.in/gB_EVf85
The Major Questions Doctrine Pollutes the Future of the Biden Administration’s Vehicle Tailpipes Regulations - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Will the North Carolina Supreme Court rule to defend or thwart protections for North Carolinians’ economic liberty? Wake Forest Law Review 2L board member Clay Shupak discusses the upcoming cases that may change the court’s approach to the Fruits of Their Labor Clause.
A Right Without Bite: Will North Carolina's Unique Protections for Economic Liberty Act Their Age and Grow Some Teeth? - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Earlier last month, a Judge in Texas dismissed a lawsuit brought by twenty-one states arguing that the CHNV Program, a program allowing individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, to enter the United States, should be repealed. Wake Forest Law Review 2L Board Member Meredith Gillespie discusses the legality of the CHNV program and the history of humanitarian parole. https://lnkd.in/g4pdh7DY
Humanitarian Parole: Demystifying President Biden's CHNV Parole Program - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Is Apple trying to justify its smartphone monopoly under the guise of protecting consumer privacy? Wake Forest Law Review 2L board member Maeve Hickey discusses Apple’s attempts to justify its anti-competition strategies in a series of antitrust actions culminating in United States v. Apple.
Will the DOJ Lower the Walls of Apple’s Walled Garden? - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Home Chef has spent millions of resources advertising under the trademark they adopted in 2014. However, their advertising efforts were hindered when Grubhub introduced an extremely similar mark, leading to litigation. Wake Forest Law Review 2L Board Member Hannah Doherty discusses the circuit split facing trademark infringement litigation cases like this one. https://lnkd.in/gqXNk4pi
Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen: Home Chef Challenges the Circuit Split on the Trademark Infringement Likelihood-of-Confusion Analysis - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
Will Florida be the next state to amend its constitution to protect access to abortion? Wake Forest University School of Law 2L and Wake Forest Law Review Online Editor Katie Palmer discusses the issue. https://lnkd.in/e9ifwQDd
Will Florida Become the Next State to Protect Abortion Access Through Constitutional Amendment? - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com
-
The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral argument regarding whether the failure to include required disclosures can give rise to a private cause of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Wake Forest Law Review 2L staff member Ryan Kainz analyzes this Supreme Court case and the impacts the decision will have on securities litigation. https://lnkd.in/gfHkVNrU
The Whole Truth About Rule 10b-5 Half-Truths: Macquire Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners, L.P. - Wake Forest Law Review
https://www.wakeforestlawreview.com