Oscar winner Cathy Schulman on âThe Idea of Youâ and making it as a female producer
![a woman holds a man's face while leaning in for a kiss in a scene from "The Idea of You"](https://cdn.statically.io/img/ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/baffb5d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2400x1600+0+0/resize/1200x800!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F29%2Ffc%2F8c353d0f4ca3b42b85dc146cdc6b%2F240430-wideshot-ideaofyou.jpg)
Despite her success, film producer Cathy Schulman has never exactly had an easy go of it in Hollywood. Even having won the best picture Oscar for âCrash,â as one of the hit filmâs credited producers, she faced money troubles in the 2000s, weathering painful court battles with famed power player Michael Ovitz and fellow âCrashâ producer Bob Yari.
Since then, sheâs fought for improved female inclusion in the entertainment business, most recently as the founder of Welle Entertainment, a production company behind movies such as CBS Filmsâ âFive Feet Apart,â Sony Picturesâ âThe Woman Kingâ and the limited Showtime series âThe First Lady,â for which she was the showrunner.
Schulmanâs latest film is âThe Idea of You,â a romantic dramedy starring Anne Hathaway as a divorced mother who strikes up a relationship with a much younger singer whom she meets at Coachella. The movie, directed by Michael Showalter, debuts May 2 on Amazonâs Prime Video.
Before founding Welle Entertainment in 2017, Schulman was head of production at STX Entertainment, overseeing films including âEdge of Seventeenâ and âBad Moms.â She served as president of the nonprofit Women in Film from 2007 to 2018. Most recently, she joined with dozens of her peers in a new organization called Producers United, which aims to get better terms for âcareer producers,â including changes to how fees are paid out in addition to gaining healthcare contributions.
Schulman spoke to The Wide Shot last week.
What was the thesis for Welle Entertainment?
I was running Women in Film at the time, and we had commissioned the initial research that was done by the [USC] Annenberg School [for Communication and Journalism] about women and entertainment.
The big transformative moment for me was when we published a study that basically proved that audiences are primarily female, and women and girls are choosing which content to buy. So I thought, isnât it funny that I was trained as a producer and executive to make sure that I was making content for men and boys?
But we were caught in this bias. The ideas were retreading, and that makes them blander and more boring. And on top of everything, boys were retreating from long-form entertainment to things like video games. So I thought, why not create a company that makes content for the majority audience? Which didnât seem like such a crazy idea.
Since then youâve made âFive Feet Apart,â âOtherhoodâ and âThe Woman King.â Has your thesis borne out?
I think that thereâs no question. I had an easier time of selling content when I focused on the female audience, because I was working on things that other people werenât, so it could stand out a little bit more. That said, do I hit a lot of obstacles every time, with all the reasons why itâs going to fail and why we should have less money than anyone else? Yes, those obstacles still exist.
âThe Idea of You,â adapted from the novel by Robinne Lee, tackles sexism, ageism and the confluence of those things and societyâs expectations for a mother whoâs divorced and on the cusp of turning 40. What drew you to this project?
Iâm always looking for commercial ideas that sneakily do a little bit more, and it occurred to me while reading this book that essentially it could be a romantic dramedy, but it wasnât about a womanâs decision between which man to choose. It was about which type of happiness to choose.
I was also surprised at my interest in the older woman/younger man thing, because itâs not like it hasnât been explored. We all know what a May-December romance is. And Iâm like, âWhy is this still so fascinating?â Every time that I get involved in a piece of content, itâs because something sticks with me and then I start to say, do I think this would hit a nerve?
One of the compelling things about the film is that itâs not an either/or proposition.
The one thing that the director, Michael Showalter, and I felt was that it was really important to make sure that the message was ultimately that one should seek happiness, but we didnât have to come down firmly on one side or another of what happiness looks like for any individual person.
The film is going to Prime Video. At the same time, weâve seen from âAnyone but Youâ that there is an appetite for romantic-type movies in theaters. Did you push for a theatrical window?
The whole decision rested in Amazonâs hands, and we heard a lot of analytics about why they made that decision. As a filmmaker, I just come out firmly on the side that I love the theatrical experience, and so itâs hard for me to imagine not wanting that, especially with something that I think crowds will love. Amazonâs analysis of the marketplace suggested that the greatest chance of success would be done this way, and those are our partners and we have to follow their lead. Itâll never make that soulful missing of the theatrical experience go away. But as a businessperson, I have to look to the distribution experts.
Since you stepped down as the head of Women in Film, have you been surprised at all by how things have changed, or not, for female executives and producers?
We went into a pretty good period of progress for a while and did see an increase in the amount of both representation onscreen for women and women of color, and also some growth in the gatekeeping, behind-the-scene roles. But I feel like weâre in a rollback again, unfortunately. The whole country is in a rollback, right? Like whatâs happened to womenâs personal rights and everything else. The danger with any progressive movement is that people get tired, and then the nature of progress is that it slips back if youâre not careful.
Just add that to the challenges of being a producer right now, with raising money and getting greenlights for projects.
Oh yeah, that. I also think that thereâs been so much degradation of what producing means. Weâve gotten to a place where thereâs been a separation of the word from the work-service that it represents.
What do you mean by that?
The word âproducerâ should mean something. It used to mean that you did a certain job.
You do many specific things as a career producer, right? You generally originate the material, find the financing, put the cast and crew together, oversee development, production and postproduction. You consult on marketing and distribution; youâre responsible for the health and well-being of the cast and crew. But thereâs been this degradation of the role.
[Producers donât have a labor union, unlike screenwriters and actors; the Producers Guild of America is a trade group.]
And then youâre faced with the fact that we no longer have that pot of gold â the profit participation â at the other end.
Thereâs the constriction in the business, so thereâs less buyers. And when you have few buyers, the first kind of content that falls apart tends to be the diverse, progressive content. When youâre in a buyerâs market, itâs all about doing what is most guaranteed to work. But the sad truth is that when you repeat whatâs been done before in an effort to make it work, it tends to not work anyway.
Weâre all trying to figure out what to do in this narrower marketplace. Which brings me back to âThe Idea of You.â You want to pick something that you feel is recognizable, but also a little fresh.
Youâre reading the Wide Shot
Ryan Faughnder delivers the latest news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production â and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Stuff we wrote
Bob Bakish is officially ousted as CEO of Paramount Global. Paramount CEO Bob Bakishâs ouster comes after David Ellisonâs Skydance Media sweetened its offer for Shari Redstoneâs National Amusements, with money earmarked for Paramountâs non-voting shareholders.
Hollywoodâs crew union negotiations have gone well so far. Now the hard part begins. The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) is scheduled to enter general contract negotiations with the Hollywood studios this week.
After scandal, movie producer Randall Emmett is flying under the radar with a new name. Whether heâs going by Emmett or Ives, the controversial producer and former âVanderpump Rulesâ star continues to confront allegations of not paying his bills on time and presiding over chaotic film sets.
Is Harvey Weinsteinâs California conviction in jeopardy after N.Y. appeals ruling? After Harvey Weinstein won an appeal to overturn his New York rape conviction, legal experts say he faces a tougher hill to climb as he attempts a similar strategy in his California case. Related: Hollywood, accusers condemn reversal of Weinstein conviction.
Questions swirl over the future of TikTok. Who could own it? How will the platform operate? Congress passed a bill that could ban TikTok. What could happen next?
Amazonâs Prime Video and Netflix are crashing TVâs ad-selling party. The streaming services will be looking for a larger share of the $27-billion pot for commercial time in the 2024-25 TV season.
Number of the week
![three billion dollars](https://cdn.statically.io/img/ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/9d5b1d9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/864x160+0+0/resize/1200x222!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F9b%2Fe9%2F5a0f71894e66aabca89d67bcd430%2F240430-wideshot-numberoftheweek.jpg)
What a week for Paramount Global. The company on Monday ousted its chief executive, Bob Bakish, replacing him with an âoffice of the CEOâ composed of three execs: Paramount Pictures Chief Executive Brian Robbins; CBS Chief Executive George Cheeks; and Showtime/MTV Entertainment Studios Chief Chris McCarthy.
This comes amid a period of exclusive negotiations for Skydance founder and tech heir David Ellison, whoâs backed by investment firms RedBird Capital and KKR, to take control of Paramount via a transaction with Shari Redstoneâs National Amusements Inc. Ellisonâs camp had offered $2 billion to buy National Amusements, which holds 77% of Paramountâs voting stock, plus a chain of movie theaters.
Bakish, whom Redstone had entrusted with leading her media empire, didnât like the prospect of such a deal (neither did non-voting shareholders, whoâd complained that their shares would be diluted in the Skydance proposal). Now heâs out after a 27-year career.
Paramount held a first-quarter earnings call Monday afternoon, which lasted just 10 minutes. The company did not take questions from analysts on the call. Investors surely have queries about, say, the Charter carriage deal that is soon to expire and in which Paramountâs declining cable channels have scant leverage. Wild times.
On Sunday, Skydance sweetened its offer by $1 billion, earmarking money for the B-class shareholders to ease some of the worries that theyâre getting short shrift in a deal that primarily benefits Redstone, according to reporting by my colleague Meg James. Waiting in the wings as an alternative is private equity giant Apollo Global Management, which has offered a deal valued at $26 billion including Paramountâs $14-billion debt load. Sony has been in talks to join Apolloâs conquest.
As far as the âoffice of the CEOâ structure goes, there was much talk in the companyâs internal communications and on the short earnings call about the camaraderie and respect that exists between the three executives (along with the requisite thank-youâs to Bakish for his service). The triumvirate is âfinalizing a new long-term plan,â they told staff in an email. While that may all be genuine, nothing about this arrangement feels permanent for obvious reasons.
The earnings themselves seemed like an afterthought. The company posted a net loss of $554 million, which was less than the more-than $1 billion it lost during the same quarter a year prior. Streaming service Paramount+ has grown to 71 million global subscribers, and the direct-to-consumer segment narrowed its quarterly loss to $286 million.
So what happens now? It sure looks like a deal with Ellison is on the inside track, but it remains to be seen whether the sweetener will satisfy the concerns of shareholders, whose holdings have been demolished by years of poor decisions. Shares were up on Monday, with investors likely sensing movement toward some resolution in this public auction.
Best of the web
â Inside the crisis at NPR. (New York Times)
â Analyst Rich Greenfield notes just how many billions Peacock has lost. (X)
â Jerry Seinfeld gave an interview to the New Yorker magazine, and boy do people have thoughts.
â Albert Brooks, the godfather of American comedy. (The Atlantic)
â Why turning stuff off and turning it back on is âgadget-fixing magic.â (Wall Street Journal)
Finally ...
Another great aging rock star interview by Mikael Wood, this time with Jon Bon Jovi on the eve of the new documentary.
Lastly, I went on Sonny Bunchâs âBulwark Goes to Hollywoodâ podcast to talk about Netflix, Paramount and A24.
The Wide Shot is going to Sundance!
Weâre sending daily dispatches from Park City throughout the festivalâs first weekend. Sign up here for all things Sundance, plus a regular diet of news, analysis and insights on the business of Hollywood, from streaming wars to production.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.