What Is Misrepresentation? Types and How It Works

What Is a Misrepresentation?

A misrepresentation is a false statement of a material fact made by one party which affects the other party's decision in agreeing to a contract. If the misrepresentation is discovered, the contract can be declared void. Depending on the situation, the adversely impacted party may seek damages.

How Misrepresentation Works

Misrepresentation applies only to statements of fact, not to opinions or predictions. Misrepresentation is a basis for contract breach in transactions, no matter the size.

A seller of a car in a private transaction could misrepresent the number of miles to a prospective buyer, which could cause the person to purchase the car. If the buyer later finds out that the car had much more wear and tear than represented, they can file a suit against the seller.

In higher-stakes situations, a misrepresentation can be considered an event of default by a lender, for instance, in a credit agreement. Meanwhile, misrepresentations can be grounds for termination of a mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deal, in which case a substantial break fee could apply.

Special Considerations

In some situations, such as where a fiduciary relationship is involved, misrepresentation can occur by omission. That is, misrepresentation may occur when a fiduciary fails to disclose material facts of which they have knowledge.

A duty also exists to correct any statements of fact that later become known to be untrue. In this case, the failure to correct a previous false statement would be a misrepresentation.

Types of Misrepresentations

There are three types of misrepresentations.

Innocent Misrepresentation

Innocent misrepresentation is a false statement of material fact by the defendant, who was unaware at the time of contract signing that the statement was untrue. The remedy in this situation is usually rescission or cancellation of the contract.

Consider a situation where a seller of a piece of land mistakenly informs a buyer that there is planning permission granted for a new housing development nearby. The seller genuinely believed this to be true based on information received from a neighbor. Unfortunately, unknown to the seller, that planning permission had since been denied. Because the buyer relied on this information in deciding to purchase the land, the seller may be liable due to innocent misrepresentation since they made a mistake (even though it was an honest mistake).

Negligent Misrepresentation

Negligent misrepresentation is a statement that the defendant did not attempt to verify was true before executing a contract. This is a violation of the concept of "reasonable care" that a party must undertake before entering an agreement. The remedy for negligent misrepresentation is contract rescission and possibly damages.

Suppose a real estate agent, while showing a property to potential buyers, states that the roof was recently renovated. It turns out that the roof needs significant repairs. Despite not intending to deceive, the agent's negligent statement about the roof's condition played a part in the buyers making an offer on the property. If the buyers later discover the true state of the roof, they may have grounds to claim damages from the agent for the costs of repairing the roof as the agent was negligent in sharing incorrect information.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Fraudulent misrepresentation is a statement that the defendant made knowing it was false or that the defendant made recklessly to induce the other party to enter a contract. The injured party can seek to void the contract and recover damages from the defendant.

Imagine a scenario where a seller knowingly advertises a used car as having only 50,000 miles on the odometer. However, the car actually has 150,000 miles on it, and the seller has rolled back the odometer. The buyer relies on this false information and would buy the car based on the misrepresented mileage. In this case, the seller's fraudulent misrepresentation gives the buyer grounds to rescind the contract, return the car, and potentially seek damages for any losses suffered due to the deception.

How to Prove Misrepresentation

In order to recover damages due to misrepresentation, there are six legal bars for the plaintiff to overcome. The plaintiff must be able to show that:

1. A representation was made.
2. The representation was false.
3. The defendant knew at the time that the representation was false, or recklessly made the statement without knowledge of its truth.
4. The representation was made with the intention that the plaintiff would rely on it.
5. The plaintiff did rely on the false representation.
6. The plaintiff suffered harm by relying on the false representation.

All six of these requirements must be met in order for a plaintiff to win a case for misrepresentation. A defendant in one of these cases need not disprove all six of these claims.

Misrepresented Financial Statements

Companies and their financial statement preparers can falsify (knowingly or unknowingly) their financial performance. Misrepresentations in financial statements can impact various stakeholders, including investors, creditors, regulators, and the broader public. Here's how each group can be affected:

• Investors: Misrepresentations, whether intentional or due to negligence, can distort the true financial health and performance of a company. For example, overstating revenues or understating expenses can artificially inflate profitability metrics, leading investors to overvalue the company's stock. Conversely, concealing liabilities or risks can mask the true financial risks faced by the company, potentially leading to losses for investors when the true financial situation is revealed.
• Creditors: Creditors use financial statements to assess the creditworthiness of a company. Misrepresentations can mislead creditors about the company's ability to repay debt obligations. For instance, if a company falsely inflates its assets or understates its liabilities, creditors may extend credit thinking a company may be able to pay off its debt when, in fact, it might not be able to.
• Regulators: Regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rely on financial statements to ensure compliance with accounting standards and securities laws. Misrepresentations can undermine the integrity of financial markets and erode investor confidence, a primary concern for regulatory bodies in charge of overseeing the stability of those markets. 
• General Consumers: Misrepresentations in financial statements can undermine public trust in a company. Even if those consumers don’t own an equity stake in the company, consumers may choose to take their business elsewhere to support more honest operations if misrepresentations were to come to light.  

Misrepresented Financial Statements and Auditors

Auditors have a responsibility to provide an objective assessment of a company's financial position and performance, making sure that the information presented is reliable and follows accounting rules. To do this, auditors conduct detailed audit procedures to examine the financial statements and supporting documentation. This includes looking through financial transactions, reviewing accounting records, and testing the effectiveness of internal controls.

Through these procedures, auditors try their best to identify any discrepancies that could indicate potential misrepresentations. They focus on both quantitative things (like the accuracy of financial figures) and qualitative things (like the disclosure of significant risks). As part of the audit, auditors communicate their findings and observations to management, an audit committee, and potentially to regulatory authorities. In the end, an auditor strives to make sure no misrepresentation is happening within a company’s financial statements.

Example of Misrepresentation

In 2022, Tesla CEO Elon Musk offered to purchase X platform (formerly Twitter) for $43 billion, an offer which the company at first resisted and then accepted. A few weeks later, and after a substantial fall in the company's share price, Musk attempted to back out of the deal, claiming that X misrepresented the number of human users on the platform.

According to his termination letter, Musk alleged that the company knowingly misrepresented the number of live users on its platform and that he had relied on those false representations when he made his takeover offer. In response, the social media company claimed that Musk's allegations were "factually inaccurate" and that the billionaire was simply trying to back out of the merger that he himself had initiated.

The Bottom Line

Misrepresentation is a legal term for any type of falsehood or omission of fact that affects the behavior of a contractor or other party. Contrary to popular belief, misrepresentation does not just mean deliberate lies—it can also include accidental omissions or reckless statements without certainty of the facts. Misrepresentation can void a contract and in some cases allow the misled party to seek damages.