Keep the Ottoman Empire neutral in WW1.
In line with the OP and comments, I agree that the "switch" from steam to diesel in Real Life was determined by the timeline and outcome of WW2. In line with @RichardKirk's comments, I believe it was a strategic move in the etymological sense: a move dictated by the necessities of preparing for war in the context of 1945-50 Europe; all other factors (environmental, economic) only subordinate.
I also believe no plausible plot device can delay WW2 by 20-30yrs as suggested by the OP: the timeline & outcome of WW1 being as in RL, WW2 must ensue exactly 20yrs after the Versailles treaty, regardless of which precise moustached psychopaths hit a stray bullet in-between. This is because the US would never regard a rearming Germany, ready to occupy Belgium, an existential threat to themselves; it was to the UK and to France, yet they were powerless to counter it w/out active US support in the League of Nations (more precisely, among the Big Four of the LoN). That the US would have their say about European affairs, via the LoN, was the price to pay for enlisting the US with the Entente in WW1.
Finally, the moves leading to WW1 and its RL outcome are themselves mostly forced: the only chaotic decision was how the Ottoman Empire picked sides. Had they but maintained a benevolent neutrality (to the Entente), the Central Empires were completely besieged and starved to death in ~2yrs, while in RL Russia was the one cut off from supplies by her allies.
So, my solution is this: when the Ottomans toured Europe in search of an alliance against Italy in 1912, instead of the meager offer they got in RL (turn into a German protectorate in all but name), have the Brits show some longsightedness: let them offer an honorable partnership to protect the neutrality of the Straits. This makes them the prime mover in the modernization of Turkey after the Balkans wars, instead of pushing her with disdain into the first consoling arms to open to her in 1914, which happened to be Germany's.
The changes in the political landscape after a 1914-16 WW1 are tremendous: no Soviet uprising in Russia, no US involvement whence no League of Nations, no Armenian genocide, no Balfour letter etc. The Concert of Europe returns, headed (unofficially) by the UK instead of Austria, with the US a mere guest star; the German Reich essentially returns to its clawless, post-1648 standing and safely without the Benelux.
Science, however, goes on as in RL: the timeline of nuclear fission is essentially unchanged, with the same effect on the timeline of strategic deterrence. This is the major novelty that prevents European diplomacy from returning to their familiar post-1816 shenanigans. Geopolitically, the world is quietly heading to an Orwellian tripolar dynamics, with the notable difference that the UK is a standard bearer of Eurasia instead of a mere bridgehead of Oceania in Europe.