Yes
So, there are a few key things that helped or hindered the development of the Theory of Evolution.
Let us get the big hinderance out the way to start with:
Religion - Specifically, any religion which posits a creator. This to this day remains the biggest opponent of Evolution. Now - I am not trying to revive the good-old debates of the mid-2000s Atheists - but the simple fact is this: If people have a reasonable explanation for a phenomena, they are disinclined to investigate further.
Case in point - we are all using the Internet to interact, how many of you know how it works? A few of us - most are happy with the explanation that it works because IT Nerds make it work. A Society where Religion has a Dogmatic grip on the populace is the biggest hurdle.
Locations where Evolution does strange things - This is the next Help and Hinderance - Hinderance because IIRC one of the driving factors for Darwin to create his theory (and there's another chap who came really close whose name completely escapes me) was observing that Animals in similar environments, but geographically distinct regions shared similar attributes - and particularly in places that didnt have a lot of human interaction (by doing silly things like travelling distances by boat and ruining things by introducing species where they do not belong) - Also these places tend to be rather remote (for the aforementioned reasons) - If you can get your transportation reliable enough to go somewhere remote enough to observe evolution, then it is possible.
Evolution was a theory made primarily from observation of Fossils and of Animals - This is the main reason I said yes - All that was needed to derive a theory of Evolution is to observe similarities in the Fossil record to modern living animals, observe adaptation to environments and observe commonalities.
Now, I make this sound simple and self-evident - in some ways it is, but to put it in context, when the whole world believed that animals were fixed and determined by a Deity, this is a huge leap.
This is one, perhaps issue though:
If your population doesn't have knowledge of Animal Husbandry or plant breeding, that will make the link much harder to derive
Edit
SARAWAK! Sarawak Law is the other thing I was thinking of. Not just Convergence (sorry this is kinda an edit reply to one of the Comments) - but also Divergence - where there are two regions that are physically close, but have some form of geographic barrier where similar species were unable to traverse, so you get wildly different evolutionary paths, despite being close.