2
$\begingroup$

If there was a whole civilization of people without sight, how would they imagine things? Would they be able to picture 3 dimensions in their heads by feeling things?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I wonder why someone voted this down? $\endgroup$
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 2:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For those born without sight it is very difficult for them to imagine what colors are like but they can use touch and echo to perceive object, the more people don't understand the more creative they become. The brain always establish patterns so that it can register as accurate as possible. $\endgroup$
    – user6760
    Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 6:58

4 Answers 4

7
$\begingroup$

Of course. After all, blind people in real life have been composers, painters, and authors. Most things in life have multiple sensory aspects. A blind person could sculpt by feeling the geometry of their medium (for example, Felice Tagliaferri). A blind artist could paint by knowing the relation of one line to another, which is likely proprioception-based. Such an artist could also lay down a textured surface as a guideline. One example would be John Bramblitt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bramblitt). Composing music, an imaginative art, is of course scarcely more difficult for the blind individual than for the sighted(compared to the previous arts). Perhaps a few people here have heard of a guy called Stevie Wonder? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Wonder). A blind person can even fly a plane (http://planelopnik.kinja.com/blind-pilot-flies-and-lands-a-real-airplane-1657930420). Talk about destroying stereotypes. I imagine that for someone who can conceive of the position of the plane relative to the ground, flying blind presents relatively few obstacles (though keeping it level might be hard).

All of the previous examples were merely for modern human societies. Since this question is in Worldbuilding, perhaps non-human senses or advanced technology is permitted. In that case, there are so many more possibilities for sensing 3D geometry: echolocation, thermoception, telepathy, magnetic fields, air currents, even whiskers!

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ It's one thing to be a blind person guided by those who love you and encourage you, and quite another to be raised in a society where nobody can see. A baby raised by parents that crawl on all fours may never even imagine to start walking, for instance. I'm not saying it is impossible, but it would require someone especially exceptional. $\endgroup$
    – Neil
    Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 8:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, of course a blind person will not learn to sculpt without the encouragement of others. Neither will a sighted person! This is the essence of culture. Do you believe that one blind person could teach another to sculpt? I do. The exceptional people in a blind society, as in a sighted society, are those who invent. It requires but a fraction of the talent to follow in their footsteps. That is precisely how the arts developed: through cultural transmission. $\endgroup$
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ That's precisely my point though. Could a blind person teach another how to sculpt? Yes, provided that both are raised in a culture where these things are done. If everyone is blind, you will not have astrologists, marine biologists, painters, or calligraphers as there is a seeing component in all of these. In our society, you even find a blind painter, because the value of his work is appreciated by others. My point is that a culture of people who have never seen the sky will almost certainly be different than our own from many points of view. $\endgroup$
    – Neil
    Commented Jul 21, 2015 at 6:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, yes. I would not expect to see a blind painter in a fully blind society. I was only trying to show that people without sight imagine things. I would expect to see blind sculptors develop, though. After all, why would a blind person not try to sculpt what they felt? As far as marine biologists, why not? Certainly there is a visual component in how these things are done now, but there is no reason a blind society could not catch fish, and with sufficient technological development, everything that is done now in marine biology could be done without sight. $\endgroup$
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented Jul 21, 2015 at 15:28
2
$\begingroup$

Yes.

Bat's have extremely limited sight, but they probably understand 3-dimensional space better than we do.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Well, their intuition is better. Physicists and mathematicians have the best understanding. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 2:36
  • $\begingroup$ Dolphins, too... $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2015 at 2:44
  • $\begingroup$ This is a common myth. Bats actually tend to have keener eyesight than humans. $\endgroup$
    – AngelPray
    Commented Jan 14, 2019 at 19:14
1
$\begingroup$

Yes.

As a real world example, composers imagine/design new songs.

They wouldn't associate it with "sight", but instead with another sense - probably touch.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This question is asked by someone who uses their sight more than their other senses. It is proven that when you loose your sight the other senses compensate and are more significant in providing feedback.

Spacial sense can best be imitated for one with sight by turning all lights out and navigating spaces you are familiar with. While you may bump into things, that all changes as you get more familiar with the steps required and placement of those objects. You have a visual memory of that space, but if you do that with a room where someone moves things around and you then navigate that space in pitch black, you will eventually learn what that space "looks" like.

Music and sound are important components without sight. There are blind people who do a form of bat echo-location by listening to the space they are navigating. They will recognize people around them by their breathing, their footsteps, their voices

Touch can also indicate different environment conditions. The air moving around your body can tell how open a space is. The feel of surfaces under your feet can indicate where in a familiar space you are in. There is a tongue device that is similar to the toy where people press their faces or hand in from one side and the rods extend forming that shape on the other... in this instance the rods form a "picture" of the physical space that is read by the wearer's tongue and helps them "see" through touch the space around them.

Smell is another sense that adapts and becomes more pronounced. Smell like touch can give indicators to space, where someone is, who is in that space with them, what objects are present.

Art and imagination in this kind of world will take on things that stimulate the senses. Sound is an obvious choice, but tactile, food, and aromatic forms of art also would be highly appreciated.

The tools and techniques that would develop in a large group without sight might surprise people who depend on sight for most of how they interact with the world.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .