Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • $\begingroup$ Something is wrong in your anecdote, poker isn't played against the house it's played against other punters, the house doesn't get involved (presumably unless there's foul play). $\endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Commented Sep 2, 2017 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Separatrix Something is wrong with you assuming he was playing poker. $\endgroup$
    – paparazzo
    Commented Sep 2, 2017 at 8:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So why mention that he was a poker pro without saying what he was playing, which is significantly more important to the story. You're leading me to assume he was playing poker. $\endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Commented Sep 2, 2017 at 8:23
  • $\begingroup$ @Separatrix If I said a famous actor beat the house would you assume they were acting. He is known as a poker pro. $\endgroup$
    – paparazzo
    Commented Sep 2, 2017 at 8:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There's no implication of what an actor would be playing, fine he wasn't playing poker, what was he playing? Your anecdote is still lacking, give it a source at least. $\endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Commented Sep 2, 2017 at 8:30