Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ "If they can be that big then they can be bigger" - Great post, but this doesn't follow. Maybe this is the biggest a star-spot can reasonably get. It's also relevant that the typical lifetime for a star-spot is only a few years. $\endgroup$
    – user2727
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 5:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think I heard the sun changes its spots every 11 years or something, would this big sun spot last any longer than that or is this a short term day-night solution? $\endgroup$
    – FreeElk
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 10:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What I took away from reading on star spots is that they are not easy to see and their behaviors on other stars is not well known. @KWeiss re "doesn't follow" - not for a scholarly paper but for a work of fiction something real and big can be made bigger when it is not real. $\endgroup$
    – Willk
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 11:43
  • $\begingroup$ @FreeElk The Sun's 11-year sunspot cycle is about the amount of sunspots, not any individual sunspot. It's also not a perfect 11-year cycle; it just happens to peak roughly every 11 years on average (not that we haven't had a double peak cycle just recently). Keep in mind what sunspots are, namely cooler areas of a star's outer layers. (That's illustrated well in the image Will included in the answer.) All else equal, which as we all know it never is, a larger, relatively cool area would probably remain cool for longer than a smaller one. $\endgroup$
    – user
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 17:05