Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ Faster orbits mean closer orbits. Closer orbits mean a much smaller/less energetic star to keep the planet in a habitable range. I'm not sure there's a star that would be small enough for any semi-reasonable day length. $\endgroup$
    – Andon
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 2:48
  • $\begingroup$ why want to have a tidally locked planet when you want a day-night-cycle? makes no sense $\endgroup$
    – Fl.pf.
    Commented May 22, 2017 at 9:26
  • $\begingroup$ Nemesis, by Isaac Asimov, (spoiler coming) features a habitable-ish Earth-sized satellite to a gas giant. Despite being tidally locked to the gas giant, it gets cyclic-ish exposure to the star. $\endgroup$ Commented May 22, 2017 at 22:50