Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This is interesting but it's worth noting that stars are somewhat .. hot to evolve sentient life, even directly on the surface $\endgroup$
    – Zxyrra
    Commented Dec 12, 2016 at 23:31
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ @Zxyrra They are suggesting you surround the star with an envelope of life. Sure, you might have a vacuum gap to attenuate it; but a shell at approx 1 AU will have roughly the right amount of light hitting it to grow plants. It will be a big sphere, mostly full of vacuum. We can give it a name. Like Dyson Sphere. After the vacuum company. >_> <_< $\endgroup$
    – Yakk
    Commented Dec 13, 2016 at 16:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Yakk how do you suggest evolving life in a place with sparse matter and an abundance of ionizing radiation? This is creative but it seems very difficult to do $\endgroup$
    – Zxyrra
    Commented Dec 13, 2016 at 21:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Who says they evolved there? It could be part of a colonisation effort by an alien species of your choice. $\endgroup$
    – Riot
    Commented Dec 13, 2016 at 22:02