Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure about that given the state of the south American ruins above - many of these have been abandoned for more than that yet are still above ground. $\endgroup$
    – Miller86
    Commented May 20, 2016 at 14:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Many weren't though. And South American rainforest is not deciduous forest anyway. They weren't dealing with a yearly 3-foot thick fall of leaves compacting to a 1-inch layer of compost, and they had substantially more rainfall clearing away what leaves did fall. If you've only got relatively low buildings then even modest accumulation of compost/soil will bury them. Skara Brae would be a classic example of this, although that had more than 1500 years to be hidden, but then that was in a location without any trees to add to the compost layer and with substantial wind erosion of soil. $\endgroup$
    – Graham
    Commented May 20, 2016 at 15:58