Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ If I would find myself under a night sky with very few stars, then my first hypothesis would be to blame the weather. When the stars are just in wrong locations, then my first assumption would be that I traveled to the southern hemisphere. I wasn't there yet, but I know that the night sky is totally different there. But someone who was already on both hemisphere would notice that the sky can't be either hemisphere. $\endgroup$
    – Philipp
    Commented Mar 25 at 10:48
  • $\begingroup$ Yes i would probably rationalize all of them if they are not too extremely obvious. Number 3 is a lot different because something like 3 to 5 very bright stars in the sky would definitely give me a feeling of dread. Though while i would not automatically conclude i was in another world it would likely still lead to me thinking about this possibility constantly. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 25 at 11:06