Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 16, 2020 at 11:03 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Aug 31, 2017 at 12:42 comment added CR Drost @Mathmagician crap, I don't even think that's an issue of counting but of proportion; if the odds ratio is 7:1 then you can only get a maximum of 4+1/7. Hm.
Aug 31, 2017 at 6:19 comment added Mathmagician BTW, if you have 4 stars from 70 reviews, that's 280 stars total, but 4.5 from 80 is 360... so the 10 family members contributed 80 stars? is this a 10 star system?
Sep 9, 2015 at 14:00 comment added supercat ...to hear the case should invent law that other judges should then follow, but rather to have the legislature say what the law should mean.
Sep 9, 2015 at 13:59 comment added supercat I would suggest that common practice places too much value on supposed "consistency" as an end unto itself, rather than recognizing inconsistency as a symptom of other problems. If a legislature writes a vague rule and one judge interprets it one way, and in the absence of that ruling another judge would decide find the opposite arguments more compelling in a different way, the latter judge shouldn't honor the more compelling argument in his case. If the law is so vague that such inconsistencies are a frequent problem, the proper solution is not to arbitrarily declare that the first judge...
Sep 8, 2015 at 22:08 history edited CR Drost CC BY-SA 3.0
The greek example.
Sep 8, 2015 at 20:33 comment added Cort Ammon One thing I explored which might be worth adding: a ROS naturally leads to a 2 step process of gathering information followed by declaring a verdict (and a penalty). A SOS may do both simultaneously, using the effects of its [potentially very small] actions upon the defendant (and/or the prosecutor) to help expose the right results as the proceedings move forward.
Sep 8, 2015 at 20:22 history answered CR Drost CC BY-SA 3.0