Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your answer has an incorrect assumption. It’s a society where killing is acceptable, not mandatory. Imagine if each set of parents had 200 children and they killed 190 of them. Those 190 children would never have killed anyone, because they died first! That society would still grow quickly enough to be a problem! $\endgroup$
    – Azrantha
    Commented Nov 25, 2022 at 11:50
  • $\begingroup$ @Azrantha That's not indiscriminate killing though, that's primarily killing children. $\endgroup$
    – 0.5
    Commented Nov 26, 2022 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ true, it was an exaggerated example to show that it can work mathematically. As mathematically, with indiscriminate killing, many of the dead will have died without killing anyone! $\endgroup$
    – Azrantha
    Commented Nov 27, 2022 at 11:10