Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • $\begingroup$ The question is based on several misconceptions. Deserts are not really the result of axial tilt: they're the result of circulation patterns and geographic barriers. For instance, a lot of desert is immediately downwind of mountain ranges. ("Rain shadow") Likewise, not all deserts are hot: the US Great Basin and the deserts of Central Asia are in temperate regions. Antarctica is also a desert. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 0:56
  • $\begingroup$ desert does not mean hot, many deserts are cold, desert refers to the amount of precipitation. $\endgroup$
    – John
    Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 5:15
  • $\begingroup$ That’s not what’s being asked. I suggest rereading the question. The tilt of the planet mainly serves to freeze water at the poles to get a dry and arid equator. I edited the question to get rid of the misleading parts. If you have further criticism feel free to edit the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 6:17
  • $\begingroup$ The problem is that things just don't work the way you seem to be assuming they do. To get maximal freezing at the poles, you'd want 0 tilt, to eliminate seasonal thaws. But the only way to get an actual desert planet (rather than a planet with occasional deserts, like Earth) is to have much less water in the first place: something like Mars, but with higher gravity to hold an atmosphere. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @jamesqf You just missed a good opportunity to answer the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 28, 2021 at 17:08