Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps also increase the openness & publicity of Mithraism. It was already widespread within the military. $\endgroup$
    – elemtilas
    Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ @elemtilas Didn't Mithraism already contributed as one of the major bridges from Roman polytheism to adopting Christianity? As I recall there was a lot of "blending" onto Christianity, which made it much more acceptable to Roman soldiers in the end. $\endgroup$
    – Upper_Case
    Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 16:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A little fiddling, and you could have a charismatic barbarian leader make a go at converting the Romans to a form of paganism. That's not technically Roman polytheism, but it sure isn't Christianity. $\endgroup$
    – Cadence
    Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 19:12
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ +1 for pointing out that Constantine was but a single note in the symphony that is the Roman history of Christianity. $\endgroup$
    – JBH
    Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ I think one way to reduce Roman tolerance would be to keep their pantheon relatively small. It's much easier to smuggle a new god (and then build up your religion around him) when most people don't even know half of their original pantheon. $\endgroup$
    – Nolonar
    Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 20:57