Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It can be tiny but it can't be too tiny "So, for instance, a 1-second-life black hole has a mass of 2.28×105 kg, equivalent to an energy of 2.05×1022 J that could be released by 5×106 megatons of TNT." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation $\endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Commented Dec 21, 2017 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ "nothing rules out super dense, but not very massive, material from existing in the universe." — sorry, but that's just not true. @Slarty explains why black hole has its limits, but our understanding of quantum & particle physics also puts some limits on non-blackhole matter. $\endgroup$
    – Mołot
    Commented Dec 21, 2017 at 22:53
  • $\begingroup$ 2,28E+05 kg is about 228 metric tons, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 22, 2017 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ @JamesMcLellan yes correct and if memory serves from another question a 600 ton black hole would last about 20 sec. So as I said it can't be too tiny mass wise. Although obviously all of these black holes would be submicroscopic $\endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Commented Dec 22, 2017 at 11:01